Harris only received five percent of Republican votes — less than the six percent Joe Biden won in 2020 when he beat Trump, as well as the seven percent won by Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she lost to him. While Harris won independents and moderates, she did so by smaller margins than Biden did in 2020.

Meanwhile, Harris lost households earning under $100,000, while Democratic turnout collapsed. Votes are still being counted, but Harris is on pace to underperform Biden’s 2020 totals by millions of votes.

  • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I don’t get why it’s hard to comprehend. By becoming (even) more conservative, more “R”, they betrayed (even more of) their base. Why would timid Republicans want to vote for traitors pandering to them?

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      Shit I was saying when Biden was still running and I got crucified for it.

      As you shift to the right you leave your base behind, ignoring a growing, left swinging faction within the party is going to lead to outcomes like this. Working class people all have the same problems, and one party says they’ll do something about it. They’re lying, people who are generally smarter and paying attention know they’re lying, but that’s not most people.

      The other party has had a chance, and failed to do anything to alleviate the concerns of the working class. Regardless of the circumstances, or their actual ability to affect change. And they spent the entire election cycle trying to curry votes from a dedicated base instead of getting voters excited about something.

      Swing left, swing hard. Become the unhinged leftist the other side is already accusing you of being.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        Its a two party system, why would anyone think being a bit more like the other guy be a good idea?

        Why would someone pick knockoff awful when the name brand is right there?

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      Democrats would prefer to lose than become more progressive because the rich and powerful still benefit from Republicans winning or Democrats winning as long as Democrats are still centre-right wing.

      As soon as Democrats move left the elites start to lose so Democrats don’t.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 minutes ago

    Both her and Clinton should have been braver with VP choice.

    They both chose VP milquetoast when the time called for people wanting change.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yes. When you abandon the left, they don’t vote for you. This is what Clinton did too

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      57 minutes ago

      They have clearly internalized the pervasive trope that leftists will vote for them, because they have no other choice, so the only thing that matters to convince is the right. Looks like they calculated wrong.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        Obama got people excited about healthcare reform. Biden got people excited about student debt relief. Clinton tried to get people excited about a female president and Harris centered her campaign around running against Trump.

        Social programs get people excited.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My take on this is that the DNC has never understood that to win the presidency in the last 20 years you need to be a fire brand.

    I think this stared in 2008 with Obama who won I believe because he fired up the base with great speeches about hope and change. It didn’t really happen, BUT the man knew how to give a speech. That got people inspired to do something and they voted.

    Bernie was another fire brand - told it like it was and it appealed to a large population.

    trump won using the same idea, but just the opposite of hope and change yet it worked. It tapped into a visceral and deep frustration that this country has left them behind.

    The modern view of the American president to the population is less of a wonky politician and more of a cheerleader for big ideas, even if those ideas are abhorrent and exceedingly horrifying.

    Harris just wasn’t the person to pull this off, she was too wonky and it felt like the entire campaign was playing the old card of “we are not trump” Instead if they really wanted to win they would have found ( 2 years ago) a feisty out spoken progressive leaning firebrand that would have inspired people to vote for something better.

    The only reason that (bland) Biden won was because of how badly trump fucked up the Covid response.

    • Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      48 minutes ago

      I think when she was announced as the candidate, she fired up the base just fine. She was different.

      Then she spent the rest of the campaign reassuring people that nothing would change, pissing away that enthusiasm.

      • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 minutes ago

        One of the frustrations I had was her solution to the housing problem was to just build more houses and give out some money. Sure great, but what I wanted to hear, and I think many other also wanted to hear, was her talking about corporate hording of housing and what she would do about that situation. But she just ignored it completely and so did Biden.

        I think instead if she came out swinging against corporate greed, even if she actually did nothing about it, would have given her more votes.

        My one hope out of this is that the massive swing to the right will be countered with more vocal progressives.

        • dank@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          She didn’t even really have a plan to build more houses, just some subsidies that wouldn’t put a dent in the problem. She should have proposed something ambitious that people could get excited about. The crazy thing is Biden had some big ambitious policies that he actudlly enacted like the Inflation Reduction Act that dwarf anything Kamala campaigned on. It’s the opposite of a winning approach that sells the stars and delivers the moon.

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        26 seconds ago

        Exactly. “I’m not trump” barely got Biden in when trump was the incumbent with covid running rampant. It didn’t work for Clinton in 2016 and unsurprisingly it didn’t work for Harris in 2024. The level of incompetence at the DNC really makes me think the actual goal is to prevent our politics/country from shifting to the left at any cost.

        • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          My feeling is that once the DNC starts to acknowledge the progressive ideas then they open the flood gates to challengers to their (limited) power.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    yeah this was a really fucking stupid idea and I think any Dingus on Twitter could have told you the same. The Trump voter base does not move. everyone’s been saying this. I don’t understand the Democrat strategy at all

    I don’t know what the actual numbers are on this, but I have to imagine the number of progressive voters who want more progressive policies far exceeds the number of Republicans that will vote Democrat. if anyone has a source to this data, I am interested in it.

    • echolalia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I don’t understand the Democrat strategy at all

      Someone else summed it up better than I can. The democratic party is doing exactly what it set out to do.

      Nitter link.

      They have no interest in furthering progressive policies so they don’t. That’s why the DNC chair is calling Bernie Sander’s critique of the party’s platform bullshit right now, instead of admitting he’s right.

      The system is as it does.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        i think some of this is true, but I don’t think that they would be implementing all of the same policies. maybe all the things that they actually care about are common between the two, and that’s what he means.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Democrats called those Twitter users Russian trolls. They are now advocating to restrict social media so this cannot happen again.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They are now advocating to restrict social media so this cannot happen again.

        source?

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Saw a brazen example yesterday about how social media is the fault of it all. It was an article like this one https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/07/10-democratic-thinkers-on-what-the-party-needs-right-now-00187993

          What we’ve seen is that tens of millions have opted into a right-wing information bubble, largely online, that has grown to eclipse almost the entire traditional media infrastructure. Often, in that bubble, they’ve become the willing consumers of lies and outrage. Trump’s real misdeeds are whitewashed while audiences are encouraged to embrace cathartic rage against rotating groups of enemies — many of which seem to suspiciously mirror historically unpopular minorities. In this fractured information environment, clownish strongmen thrive, their meme-like public personas enrapturing otherwise disengaged voters — a trend we’ve seen across the globe, as social media increasingly displaces traditional media.

          Democrats need to recognize that it is impossible to win votes by improving voters’ lives, when your opponent has a national rage machine it can toggle on or off at will. We will see the next iteration of this game soon enough, when the right switches to praising the precise economy they blasted for years, likely spiking economic satisfaction through the roof. This capacity — dominating media and social media, and its power to shape public opinion — has been the obsessive focus of the right for years. Democrats have almost completely ignored these questions in favor of wonky policy and kitchen-table economics. If the party continues to ignore this problem, it courts oblivion. Democrats must find a way to make headway in modern media, and wrest more control of the national information environment from Trump and his band of thugs.

          My favorite line

          Let’s start with where Democrats should NOT go. We should not blame Vice President Kamala Harris or her campaign.

            • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Too much effort to go look for it. Keep an eye out and you will frequently come across an article where they discuss the need for “more control over social media because of foreign interference”.

  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Kamalas campaign thought they could win without offending any megadonors, despite seeing what a bit of honesty did for them right after biden was replaced.

    Ive never seen such obvious virtue signaling, I’m not sure kamala even believed her own words.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Here’s a fun little tip if you’re ever able to try this again.

    MLK Jr. never appealed to the white man, he never tried to win over whitey nor tone down his message so that he didn’t alienate his opressors, and he never tried to get the Klan on his side.

    Notice how we don’t have segregation anymore? It’s because if Dr. King did these things, he’d have been luaghed at.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And instead he was shot at, not for the race stuff, but when he started talking about the class divide in general.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ding ding ding! Trump went further right and got more support. DNC should go further left. People want radical change in 2024

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The fascist playbook has always been “meet me in the middle” and then take two steps back. Rinse, repeat. Fuck bipartisanship and fuck the corpo Dems.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If we wanted to be Republicans we’d be Republicans for fucks sake…

    We can’t have 2 parties fighting to be the most hateful party of the billionaires. I mean I guess we can but only one gets to win.

    • buttfarts@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The Democrats have been chasing the mythical moderate conservative at the expense of the progressive left forever and have learned nothing. I want a fire and brimstone progressive who is belligerent and aggressive

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’d even be happy to settle for someone in the middle of the party willing to fight for the party’s supposed ideals. Remember when one of her slogans was “when we fight, we win”? Not “when we bipartisan, we win” or “when we coopt conservative issues, we win”.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Yeah, the notion that she was going to put a Republican in her cabinet…did anyone think that was a good idea? I mean, outside the beltway media?

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I know every early on she was talking about possibly having a Republican Vice President before she wised up and went with Tim Walz and ran on his progressive ideas for about… three seconds till Nancy and the DNC told her to just do what Hillary did, as that worked for her and Kamela is obviously the second female president right now. /s

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Seeing Walz as her VP pick was such a win and then everything started slipping away. If you listened to her speeches you’d start to notice she was slowly leaning more conservative, slowly backpedaling on a lot of Biden admin policies even. And for some reason she was absolutely obsessed with going on right wing media outlets.

        I genuinely think she’s rather well spoken but what a waste of potential.

        • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I was kind of Lukewarm on Walz initially, but he was super endearing. He was cooking there for a minute and then the DNC muzzled him. I remember the moment he got shut up about the electoral college I thought to myself “annnnd now all of his appeal is gone and he’s just another boring politician”. It was really startling to see how little he actually had to do to get the leash tugged.

    • Femcowboy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If there is one lesson we should learn, it’s that they don’t care to win. They are owned by the same corporate big wigs as Trump. They’re on the same team, capitalism.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I mean that’s basically what Obama did. It’s what Trump does. If you promise 100% and only give 30% you’ll be remembered as a good or good ish president. 60%+ and you’re the greatest president of all time. But when you promise -10% you’re just not gonna win.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Hell, just imagine if Democrats hadn’t let the parliamentarian stand in their way on the minimum wage. Just that by itself would have made it a lot harder for Republicans to claim that Democrats don’t give a shit if their voters can pay for food.

          Sinema’s thumbs down remains Democrats’ last word on the subject. And it’s not like she was the lone obstructionist in the party. She was one of EIGHT Democrats who voted against raising the minimum wage.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    When you consider that left leaning folk are more likely to lean into voting apathy that the right-wing, the DNC were fools to assume they had all the left-wing votes in the bag without actually doing anything to appeal to them.

    For Christ’s sake, Harris got in because people wanted change over Biden, her campaign was for change, yet the first thing she says is she doesn’t plan to do anything different to Biden - and if that’s not a momentum killer, I don’t know what is.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The Republicans had their little tea party a few years ago. The Democrats need a Guillotine Party to properly represent us.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The Tea Party forced the GOP to rebrand and restructure itself around the most extreme right wing ideas possible

      Occupy Wallstreet tried to do the same thing, and… were savagely beaten by the police over it.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Because the Tea Party was useful to just make the Republicans more unapologetically anti-government (something rich people like) while Occupy was demanding that Democrats become unapologetically antagonistic to rich people.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They had the billionaire Koch’s to fund that. We’re never getting a billionaire to fund the leopard party that will eat their faces.

      :(

      • nxn@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, there should have been limits set on campaign costs, lobbying, media, etc. It’s at a point where it doesn’t seem like it’s even possible to have a middle-class focused campaign that can openly say its basis is on taxing the fuck out of the top 1%.

        But all I know is this: the second Trump term will make the standard of life in America far worse for most people. There will be hunger in 2028 for someone to simply say “We’ll fix the middle class, and we’ll make Musk, Bezos, etc pay for it”. Hopefully by then what’s left of twitter will not be as relevant as today, so that the message can at least have a hope of spreading through social media successfully.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I want to be hopeful but I can’t find a logical progression to that stage knowing what the Republicans plan to do and their stranglehold on popular social media. The population will continue to be brainwashed into thinking Trump gives a shit and see him helping while also being told right wing Democrats are communists…

          No one else stands a chance when we have corporate media or right wing social media as our options. I know there was a socialist candidate this cycle and Lemmy was literally the only place I saw her.