Harris only received five percent of Republican votes — less than the six percent Joe Biden won in 2020 when he beat Trump, as well as the seven percent won by Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she lost to him. While Harris won independents and moderates, she did so by smaller margins than Biden did in 2020.

Meanwhile, Harris lost households earning under $100,000, while Democratic turnout collapsed. Votes are still being counted, but Harris is on pace to underperform Biden’s 2020 totals by millions of votes.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My take on this is that the DNC has never understood that to win the presidency in the last 20 years you need to be a fire brand.

    I think this stared in 2008 with Obama who won I believe because he fired up the base with great speeches about hope and change. It didn’t really happen, BUT the man knew how to give a speech. That got people inspired to do something and they voted.

    Bernie was another fire brand - told it like it was and it appealed to a large population.

    trump won using the same idea, but just the opposite of hope and change yet it worked. It tapped into a visceral and deep frustration that this country has left them behind.

    The modern view of the American president to the population is less of a wonky politician and more of a cheerleader for big ideas, even if those ideas are abhorrent and exceedingly horrifying.

    Harris just wasn’t the person to pull this off, she was too wonky and it felt like the entire campaign was playing the old card of “we are not trump” Instead if they really wanted to win they would have found ( 2 years ago) a feisty out spoken progressive leaning firebrand that would have inspired people to vote for something better.

    The only reason that (bland) Biden won was because of how badly trump fucked up the Covid response.

    • Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      I think when she was announced was the candidate, she fired up the case just fine. She was different.

      Then she spent the rest of the campaign reassuring people that nothing would change, pissing away that enthusiasm.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Based on them already attacking Bernie, who sucked up to them so hard this last year, I doubt they’re going to listen to anyone’s opinion if it doesn’t also come with millions of dollars

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    yeah this was a really fucking stupid idea and I think any Dingus on Twitter could have told you the same. The Trump voter base does not move. everyone’s been saying this. I don’t understand the Democrat strategy at all

    I don’t know what the actual numbers are on this, but I have to imagine the number of progressive voters who want more progressive policies far exceeds the number of Republicans that will vote Democrat. if anyone has a source to this data, I am interested in it.

    • echolalia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I don’t understand the Democrat strategy at all

      Someone else summed it up better than I can. The democratic party is doing exactly what it set out to do.

      Nitter link.

      They have no interest in furthering progressive policies so they don’t. That’s why the DNC chair is calling Bernie Sander’s critique of the party’s platform bullshit right now, instead of admitting he’s right.

      The system is as it does.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        i think some of this is true, but I don’t think that they would be implementing all of the same policies. maybe all the things that they actually care about are common between the two, and that’s what he means.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Democrats called those Twitter users Russian trolls. They are now advocating to restrict social media so this cannot happen again.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They are now advocating to restrict social media so this cannot happen again.

        source?

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Saw a brazen example yesterday about how social media is the fault of it all. It was an article like this one https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/07/10-democratic-thinkers-on-what-the-party-needs-right-now-00187993

          What we’ve seen is that tens of millions have opted into a right-wing information bubble, largely online, that has grown to eclipse almost the entire traditional media infrastructure. Often, in that bubble, they’ve become the willing consumers of lies and outrage. Trump’s real misdeeds are whitewashed while audiences are encouraged to embrace cathartic rage against rotating groups of enemies — many of which seem to suspiciously mirror historically unpopular minorities. In this fractured information environment, clownish strongmen thrive, their meme-like public personas enrapturing otherwise disengaged voters — a trend we’ve seen across the globe, as social media increasingly displaces traditional media.

          Democrats need to recognize that it is impossible to win votes by improving voters’ lives, when your opponent has a national rage machine it can toggle on or off at will. We will see the next iteration of this game soon enough, when the right switches to praising the precise economy they blasted for years, likely spiking economic satisfaction through the roof. This capacity — dominating media and social media, and its power to shape public opinion — has been the obsessive focus of the right for years. Democrats have almost completely ignored these questions in favor of wonky policy and kitchen-table economics. If the party continues to ignore this problem, it courts oblivion. Democrats must find a way to make headway in modern media, and wrest more control of the national information environment from Trump and his band of thugs.

          My favorite line

          Let’s start with where Democrats should NOT go. We should not blame Vice President Kamala Harris or her campaign.

  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Kamalas campaign thought they could win without offending any megadonors, despite seeing what a bit of honesty did for them right after biden was replaced.

    Ive never seen such obvious virtue signaling, I’m not sure kamala even believed her own words.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Here’s a fun little tip if you’re ever able to try this again.

    MLK Jr. never appealed to the white man, he never tried to win over whitey nor tone down his message so that he didn’t alienate his opressors, and he never tried to get the Klan on his side.

    Notice how we don’t have segregation anymore? It’s because if Dr. King did these things, he’d have been luaghed at.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Ding ding ding! Trump went further right and got more support. DNC should go further left. People want radical change in 2024

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If we wanted to be Republicans we’d be Republicans for fucks sake…

    We can’t have 2 parties fighting to be the most hateful party of the billionaires. I mean I guess we can but only one gets to win.

    • buttfarts@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The Democrats have been chasing the mythical moderate conservative at the expense of the progressive left forever and have learned nothing. I want a fire and brimstone progressive who is belligerent and aggressive

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’d even be happy to settle for someone in the middle of the party willing to fight for the party’s supposed ideals. Remember when one of her slogans was “when we fight, we win”? Not “when we bipartisan, we win” or “when we coopt conservative issues, we win”.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah, the notion that she was going to put a Republican in her cabinet…did anyone think that was a good idea? I mean, outside the beltway media?

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I know every early on she was talking about possibly having a Republican Vice President before she wised up and went with Tim Walz and ran on his progressive ideas for about… three seconds till Nancy and the DNC told her to just do what Hillary did, as that worked for her and Kamela is obviously the second female president right now. /s

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Seeing Walz as her VP pick was such a win and then everything started slipping away. If you listened to her speeches you’d start to notice she was slowly leaning more conservative, slowly backpedaling on a lot of Biden admin policies even. And for some reason she was absolutely obsessed with going on right wing media outlets.

        I genuinely think she’s rather well spoken but what a waste of potential.

        • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          I was kind of Lukewarm on Walz initially, but he was super endearing. He was cooking there for a minute and then the DNC muzzled him. I remember the moment he got shut up about the electoral college I thought to myself “annnnd now all of his appeal is gone and he’s just another boring politician”. It was really startling to see how little he actually had to do to get the leash tugged.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I mean that’s basically what Obama did. It’s what Trump does. If you promise 100% and only give 30% you’ll be remembered as a good or good ish president. 60%+ and you’re the greatest president of all time. But when you promise -10% you’re just not gonna win.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Hell, just imagine if Democrats hadn’t let the parliamentarian stand in their way on the minimum wage. Just that by itself would have made it a lot harder for Republicans to claim that Democrats don’t give a shit if their voters can pay for food.

          Sinema’s thumbs down remains Democrats’ last word on the subject. And it’s not like she was the lone obstructionist in the party. She was one of EIGHT Democrats who voted against raising the minimum wage.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The Republicans had their little tea party a few years ago. The Democrats need a Guillotine Party to properly represent us.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The Tea Party forced the GOP to rebrand and restructure itself around the most extreme right wing ideas possible

      Occupy Wallstreet tried to do the same thing, and… were savagely beaten by the police over it.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Because the Tea Party was useful to just make the Republicans more unapologetically anti-government (something rich people like) while Occupy was demanding that Democrats become unapologetically antagonistic to rich people.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They had the billionaire Koch’s to fund that. We’re never getting a billionaire to fund the leopard party that will eat their faces.

      :(

      • nxn@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, there should have been limits set on campaign costs, lobbying, media, etc. It’s at a point where it doesn’t seem like it’s even possible to have a middle-class focused campaign that can openly say its basis is on taxing the fuck out of the top 1%.

        But all I know is this: the second Trump term will make the standard of life in America far worse for most people. There will be hunger in 2028 for someone to simply say “We’ll fix the middle class, and we’ll make Musk, Bezos, etc pay for it”. Hopefully by then what’s left of twitter will not be as relevant as today, so that the message can at least have a hope of spreading through social media successfully.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    NO! Harris just needed to go further right. Forced goose-stepping marches at rallies. Pledges to eradicate all minorities. Promise global wars of conquest.

    Outflank Trump on the right, and the republicans AND democrats will vote for you.

  • ModestMeme@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So left wing Democrats responded by sitting on their hands instead of voting, knowingly allowing the country to slide into whatever authoritarian hellhole that awaits us? Now that’s the definition of pettiness.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      This election was lost in every measurable way. She did not lose because of leftists who didn’t vote on principal. She lost because the working class overwhelmingly chose not to vote for her. Many of them voted for Trump instead. Many first-time voters voted for Trump. She thoroughly lost to him in every possible way.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      We kept trying to warn you.

      And every time - every last fucking time - anyone told you that moving to the right was going to cause people to stay home, you lot shot the messenger. Every time someone screamed the writing on the wall out loud, centrists who were so happy that the party was finally embracing genocide and Cheney were like “Russian! Tankie! Trumpist!”

      I voted for Harris. You’ll blame me anyway. Democrats will always shoot the messenger and double down on their simping for fascists.

      • h6a@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I said basically the same the article says a couple of days ago and was pelted with a gazillion negative votes. Centrists are averse to learning from mistakes, otherwise they wouldn’t be centrists.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 hours ago

          “I do not think that liberals understand the difference between influence and power, and the liberals get confused seeking influence rather than power. The conservatives on the right wing, or the fascists, understand power, though, and they move to consolidate power while the liberal pushes for influence.”

          Thanks for sharing that link. It unfortunately still shows to be true even today. :(

      • return2ozma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Every time someone screamed the writing on the wall out loud, centrists who were so happy that the party was finally embracing genocide and Cheney were like “Russian! Tankie! Trumpist!”

        Edit: the downvotes prove my point hah

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Of course, they also said that you would be gone as soon as the election was over, since they couldn’t accept that anyone who deviated from their pro-genocide orthodoxy could be an actual person and not a Russian bot.

          There will be no apologies from any of them for their disgusting near-constant libel that only stopped once there was a rule against calling people Russian bots. They just switched to calling anyone who saw what was going to happen a Trump supporter instead.

          They’re too busy trying to figure out how to justify how this loss means they need to move to the right.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m not nearly as much of a downvote magnet as either of you, and I still have some dude following me around claiming I’m a Stein shill despite every mention of her in my history being to shit on her. They’ve just got the one move.

    • b34k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yes, my friend was one of them. I was shocked when 2 weeks before election he told me he was planning on not voting.

      I asked why and he cited holding the same position Isreal as Biden, and courting republicans like Cheney, saying that was not a good look for the party at all.

      I told him it’s not ideal, but we need to vote to keep Trump out…. Sometimes we just have to be pragmatic.

      He responded saying it’s the Dem establishment that keeps allowing a boogey man like Trump to rise so they can shove center right corporatists down our throats. He said he was abstaining from voting to send a message to the DNC, and followed it up with, “we survived a first Trump term, I’m sure we can survive a second.”

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        12 hours ago

        we survived a first Trump term

        As long as you weren’t one of the million Americans who died of COVID thanks to his misadministration.

        Or the Capitol police who died as a result from his attempted insurrection.

        • b34k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I mean, he’s an ex-pat who was living in Hong Kong, S Korea, and Vietnam for most of Trumps first term… so I’m sure he didn’t feel it as hard as most of us who were here for it.

          • Jerkface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            10 hours ago

            “Thousands of my countrymen will perish, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make.”

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              It’s a mistake reasoning as if you’re taking of one guy. Maybe one third of your population voted, and most of those voted for Trump, it means that most of you guys are pretty ok with dying during the next COVID or whatever

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I asked why and he cited holding the same position Isreal as Biden, and courting republicans like Cheney, saying that was not a good look for the party at all.

        I told him it’s not ideal

        And this is what you don’t get. There’s a huge fucking gap between “not ideal” and “supporting genocide to the point that Dick Cheney likes you.” And you didn’t acknowledge it. You just belittled it with “not ideal.” Because you couldn’t admit that what Democrats were doing was monstrous and unconscionable.

        Anyone who pulls this “you didn’t get 100% of everything you want, but…” shit? They got 100% of everything they wanted. Especially the genocide support. And especially Cheney.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        He responded saying it’s the Dem establishment that keeps allowing a boogey man like Trump to rise so they can shove center right corporatists down our throats. He said he was abstaining from voting to send a message to the DNC, and followed it up with, “we survived a first Trump term, I’m sure we can survive a second.”

        I remember when I was 14.

        • b34k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, I am definitely in the camp that Trump part 2 will be worse…. but we don’t know for sure yet

          • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Keep in mind Trump is pushing 80 and has a steady diet of McDonalds and Diet Coke. Here’s to hoping nature takes its course.

              • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Better isn’t the word I would use. I don’t think Vamce ilcould be the cult leader Trump is. I think when Trump dies it will at least take some time to build up another cult leader.

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I honestly don’t know. He’s not as viscerally mean as Trump, but he’s also a lot smarter. I think some part of him is a fancy boy who wants to be liked and to win by being clever and insightful rather than just brutal. He used to write about his nice life in San Francisco doing community gardening. If he could get the upper-crust to like him (not just use him) that seems like something he’d enjoy.

                But then again, he sold out to the guy he thought was Hitler, so he might just be completely without shame or conscience.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        “we survived”

        Many didn’t and even more won’t this time, your friend is a genocide supporter

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          So not voting for genocidal candidates now make genocide support? stop projecting.

          The Dems were hellbent on supporting gneocide. People chose to be fine with it, even attacking people who called it out.

          The flak we got here for saying for months the Dems need to stop the genocide support to win the election now raises the question whether they were just tactically wrong, or whether they werent really into the genocide themselves. That would explain why now there is efforts to project it on the other people.

          At every turn we were told that supporting genocide is better than supporting genocide and homophobia. Saying we should push for a non genocidal candidate, for which there was plenty of time at first, got immediately shut down.

          The most consistent position of the Biden/Harris fans was to accept genocide, because that was the strongest criticism raised consistently against them. Now you end up not only having lost the election but having lost the election because you were in support of genocide.

          It is no wonder that Trump managed to win, when the center is so morally bankrupt. It is no wonder that there was no way to inspire people to vote for Harris and Biden if the messaging constantly was “yeah we are morally bankrupt and we are also genociders and racists, but we are less than the other side. This is as good as we allow to happen”.

          This is on the Democrat elites and their supporters. Own up to it instead of projecting the blame.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Democrats: Support Israel, say they want the conflict to stop and a two States solution. Want to send weapons to Ukraine. Support minorities in the US.

            Republicans: Support the genocide of Palestinians, of Ukrainians and of minorities inside the USA.

            Voting for Republicans and not voting (so leaving the door open to them) is supporting genocide.

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              So every Israel aka genocide supporter had a safe vote with Trump. Everyone who opposes it had no choice with either party.

      • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Funny thing is your friends opinions are popular on lemmy.ml which makes it seem like foreign actors are pushing these talking points. They definitely worked in Trumps favor.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Now the blue MAGA is talking about the election being stolen…

          Seriosuly how did you expect to win against Trump by copying Trump? People always chose the original authoritarian nazi asshole over the knock-off copy.

          You know what wouldnt have worked in Trumps favor? Stopping the genocide in Gaza. That would have led to a landslide victory for the Dems.

          • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Now the blue MAGA is talking about the election being stolen…

            What is this supposed to mean? Who is the blue maga?

            Who is suggesting coping Trump?

            The polls show voters were motivated by inflation. As much as I’d like the people of Palestine to not be safe and thrive, I literally don’t know anyone irl that considered that when voting. But the way it is pushed on lemmy you’d think it is Iran voting for Americas next president.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I don’t agree with him, but I think he’s expecting them to support liberal progressive policies. Seems to be taking the stance of “if we can’t improve things it’s better to watch it all burn rather than slowly rot”.

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Tell him that not voting to convince them to run liberal progressive policies won’t work. You can’t play Mexican standoff because the Dems have an out: the center voters.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              They tried that this time. They basically told the left to fuck off and die. Moving to the right has very publicly failed.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  What exactly do you think should have been done differently for Harris to activate this “just win with centrists” option? Because it very much seems like that was just tried and failed miserably.

            • orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I’m not OP so I don’t actually know him so I can’t tell him anything, although I do know one person like that. As for your point I’m not sure that actually follows since those center voters didn’t show up to save Harris this time. If the DNC keeps losing elections at some point, assuming we’re all still here and we even still have elections, they will have to try something different. It’s a very risky play but I also can’t say it won’t work.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                Harris relied on the left showing up for their rights and for democracy. That was a ton of her campaign. And the left didn’t show up. If they don’t show up for that, they won’t show up for anything. They will try something different and that’s going all in on the center voter, who actually show up.

                • orclev@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  I replied to your other comment where you said basically the same thing, but the short version is there clearly isn’t enough center voters for that to be a winning strategy. If they try that next election (If there even is a next election) it’s going to be an even more lopsided victory for the Republicans.

                • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  You’re right. I don’t buy this narrative that the dems lost because they were left enough. The polls show voters were motivated by inflation and thought Biden’s progressive policies were to blame.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Well Biden for example could’ve done a much better job actually persecuting him for his crimes. He can do that as the head of the Executive branch.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Prosecute is probably the word you’re looking for, but I wouldn’t mind a bit of persecution being mixed in. Better than just letting him walk.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Sorry dude, the problem is well beyond “leftists” and sooner or later you’ll need to confront that.

    • IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The average voter mindset is “which president will get me cheaper food?”

      My parents get fed propaganda from Wechat (yes that Chinese app) saying democrats are letting too much illegal immigrants in, taking up too much resources.

      We are legal immigrants, but shes doesn’t see “illegal immigrant” is a dogwhistle about all immigrants that they dont like like black or brown people, or anyone they deem inferior.

      Doesnt help the fact that Eric Adams and NYC democrats are building homeless shelters near Chinese American population.

      My parents told me some of our relatives in NYC voted Trump, Asian Americans voting trump.

      They say some Asian American co-workers at their workplace are supporting Trump.

      My parent say “Its fine, we survived one term under trump”

      Everyone who’s a US Citizen in our household voted Kamala Harris. We tried. Our state PA still went red.

      My US Citizen mom once said, “maybe we shouldn’t vote for democrats, look at what they did in NYC (refering to homeless shelters)”, and I reminded her about the Chinese Exclusion Act. So she vote Harris because I told her to. Like she didnt have a mind of her own. If her children turned out to be conservatives, she’d vote trump. Some people just dont care about politics. Similarly, some people have apolitical children but political parents, those children then vote for who their parents vote for.

      We need to fix this voter apathy. Democracy is just broken.

      (oh wow didnt mean to type a paragraph, sorry for the wall of text, election results still enraging me…)

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Blue state examples are often particularly confusing for the politically uninvolved, as Eric Adams is pretty close to a Republican. Once a state gets blue enough, anyone with ambition will just say they’re Democrats and then do center-right stuff. Often the state parties are not ideological enough to deny the brand when it’s just easier to make a bigger and bigger tent of insiders.

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Honestly unfortunately mostly unrealistic: a systemic chage towards deliberative democracy (not just USAs broken electoral democracy) would be the best according to most political science. It’s (way to) slowly happening in some European states (so the right shift may reverse that trend again). This indirection vie simple voting tends to lean towards populism and manipulation. Which got unfortunately incredibly obvious in the presidential election…

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m not one of them, I voted a month or so in advance by mail.

      But I wonder if some people are tired of the lack of change with Democrats in charge and believe that things need to get worse before they can get better.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Pretty much, although it’s probably an exaggeration to call them Democrats. In reality most of them are likely unaffiliated with any party. But it was literally Harris’s job to convince them to come out and vote for her and she failed at it. When a candidate loses an election, barring election interference, it’s their fault. Harris fucked us all by running as a diet Republican. Odds are anyone in here reading this did everything we could to hand her the win, but she pissed it all away by trying to steal votes from the Republicans instead of convincing people that they needed to get off their asses and come vote for her.

      • ifGoingToCrashDont@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Dude, she had like 100 days to put together a campaign. She had to make a gamble and trust that the 2020 Dem voters were already in her corner so she could go after some big fish with the little time she had.

        • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Dude, lets be real. The only reason the DNC pushed Biden out of the way was because polling numbers said the incumbent advantage (and his policies) weren’t going to be enough to win it for him. So Kamala comes out of the gate with a boost (because she’s not Joe) and promptly proclaims she can’t name a single policy decision she would have made differently than Biden. That’s not winning undecided voters from either side.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            and promptly proclaims she can’t name a single policy decision she would have made differently than Biden.

            Literally not true. Were you just not paying attention?

            • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              47 minutes ago

              Shortly after becoming candidate, she was asked in an interview if she could think of anything she would have done different than Biden. She replied:

              “There is not a thing that comes to mind… and I’ve been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact, the work that we have done,”

              I voted for Harris but I think that was a monumental fuckup.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          She got handed a losing Biden campaign that was on fire, and thought the smart move was to double down on his policies that were already losing him the election, and then to throw in some Republican talking points. It was very obviously a losing strategy no matter how little time she had. The Democrats have been relying on “not Republicans” to carry them to victory for so long they seem to have forgotten why people vote for them over the Republicans.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      For many, actively supporting Israeli genocide is something they simply can’t support.

      If there’s anything that this election has proven, it’s that there are A LOT of one issue voters in this country, across the board. They’ll ignore everything else for the one issue they care about above all else. And when you only have two viable parties, that forced a black and white decision.

      The fundamental solution is eradicating First Past the Post and getting ranked choice voting so we have a multitude of parties that are all more nuanced instead.

      But that won’t happen unless we abandon both of the major parties we have now, and they can’t let that happen because that means they lose power.

      • ModestMeme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        What is Trump’s stated opinion on Israel and its war in Gaza? What is Trump’s stated opinion -and first term actions- on Muslims? Seriously, the Biden & Harris = “genocide” horseshit was 100% designed to disenfranchise Democrats. Congress votes on foreign aid. Congress is largely Republican. Protesters NEVER went after Republicans.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          So why are the democrats currently taking part in genociding Palestinians? Thats horseshit too?

          Is anything stopping them from being vocally opposed to the situation?

          Both candidates messaging was they would “get the war over with” but I guess it sounds better coming from Kamala than Trump?

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Oh 100%. But if there’s anything this election proved, it’s that the average American is fucking stupid, gullible as shit, and unable to determine propaganda from reality.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah, and the problem is people just kind of stop at “they’re dumb” like that’s just the end of it. “They’re dumb and our opponents are unscrupulous so we’ll never win until dumbness is eradicated”. It’s an influence campaign. Figure out a way to make the dumb people want to vote for you! The dumb people exist, some of them vote, and others could probably be encouraged to vote who don’t.

            No ad agency would stay in business by saying “sorry, we didn’t get you any extra sales, but it’s not our fault because the consumers are dumb, and also you should hire us to do it all over again next time because our failure was the absolute best that could have been done under the circumstances”.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They all campaigned for Harris and mostly held their criticism to themselves. Harris is the one who decided to go campaign with Liz Cheney and Mark Cuban.

    • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I seriously doubt left wingers were the difference in this election. I doubt there are significant enough numbers of far left people in Georgia, North Carolina, Michigan, and Wisconsin for it to have made any real difference.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Harris relied on the left showing up for their rights and for democracy. But they will literally never show up. This is why the Dems will never, ever rely on the left showing up ever again. Dems will go hard center next election.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t think there’s enough center left for them to go any harder center without going further left. They were already running on a bunch of right wing Republican policies. They’ve only got three options. Go harder right and actually become diet Republicans (all the oligarchy, but only half the fascism!). Stay exactly where they are. Or go left and return to being mildly progressive. They’ve shown that where they are currently is a losing proposition, so realistically their option is to try to appeal to the middle of the Republican base, or walk back some of their right shift of the last few decades. I don’t think they’re going to be able to successfully out Republican the Republicans so they’ve really only got one viable play.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I don’t know how else to say it: Harris relied on the left with abortion rights and saving democracy, and the left didn’t show up. The center cares about inflation and housing, which Harris did not address enough. They will go to that center, Bill Clinton’s “It’s the economy, stupid”. There will be no real progress, just economy for the center.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Left isn’t just social policies, it’s economic policies as well. She should have been talking about inflation and housing this election in addition to things like abortion. Instead she decided to focus on border control and foreign policy, two Republican talking points, and even worse she decided to go right on both of them.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 hours ago

              We live in different worlds because I think her focus was on abortion and saving democracy. Border is both center and right imo, you’d be amazed.

              Foreign policy is an example of how no one cares about Gaza or Ukraine (or NATO), which are what the left cares about. The left didn’t show up. Yes the Gaza situation is fucked, but the difference between Harris and Trump are stark and vast.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                but the difference between Harris and Trump are stark and vast.

                And you think making that difference narrower would have improved Harris’ chances?

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                The difference is in who they will fuck over so we can stay greedy and entitled. Democrats fuck over poor people, republicans fuck over minorities and immigrants. Both groups fuck over the rest of the world.

                The left would vote for the “won’t fuck anyone over” party if there was one.

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They did, but it isn’t great knowing how much better they are than you? We can at least take comfort in their “moral high ground” even though they let a guy who explicitly stated he wanted to be a dictator become president.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s not so much as that it collapsed as it was artificially inflated in 2020.

    The drive for covid-safe vote by mail turned out far more people in 2020 than 2024 and that helped Biden.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Trump seems to have turned out just as many as before. Plus, I don’t think any of the blue wall states changed their vote by mail policies.