• justhach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Kamala Harris Hillary Clinton predicted to win by nearly every major forecaster”

    Its like 2016 never even fucking happened lol

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I wouldn’t say giving Harris a 50.4 percent chance of winning is predicting her to win. That’s effectively a coin toss.

    • ohellidk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      yeah, I really hate seeing these types of articles during elections. some will skim past it and go “well, its cool. I don’t need to vote, she got it” and that kind of lazyness is how elections are lost.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s the whole point. America’s plutocracy — who own most of the media — want a fascist dictatorship. They’ve been financing and amplifying Trump the entire time.

        What more could a capitalist want than no competition, low/zero taxes, and not having to worry about the risk that democracy represents to their wealth and power…

  • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Vote. Pressure those around you to vote as well. I had to watch Gore lose, Hillary lose, we can’t keep doing this.

  • Ellvix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Articles like this are going to make people think they don’t have to vote. Ffs

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is extremely misleading. Most data-driven outlets are open about saying that a 51% chance of a Harris victory is essentially a coin flip.

    And the ones that are based off of gut feelings rather than data? They’re less than useless.

  • HorreC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I love how the only time @return2ozma@lemmy.world gets a positive subject rating is only if its towing the line info (not that its not factual, some times with a bad title) but the other posts where they make great points or even just reporting other facts, and they downvote them into the ground.

  • TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But remember, we DO. NOT. LET. UP.

    Not until every vote has been cast. Not until it’s over. Don’t get cocky, this is the narrowest race I’ve ever seen and by god there is no room for apathy or overconfidence.