• OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 months ago

    His greatest mistake was hiring people more loyal to the country than to him. That’s his take-away from the experience. And half the country is fine with that and wants him to get another shot at it.

    Fuck.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    That would be one of the central problems of fascism. People are hired based on loyalty first, and competence a distant second. On top of that, the fundamental worship of power in fascism means everyone is trying to be powerful, so nobody is all that loyal, anyway.

    It will always fall apart because of this, but it can also kill everyone else in the process.

  • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Sounds like the hallmark of a very shitty leader. Poor judge of character.

    Unless… he’s just so repugnant that any rational human would end up betraying him because his idea and policies are poisonous to the soul.

    Either way, shit-tier leader.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    He’s right. The next time, he’ll only have people completely loyal and ready to do massive harm. He never believed he’d win the first time and was completely unprepared. If he wins again, his staff is planned well in advance and we’re fucked.

  • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, yeah, that would be a problem in most cases. Why did he do that? Is he still doing that? Will he do it again if he is reelected? How would he know if they are loyal before hiring them?

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      He didn’t expect to win in 2016. He’s been gearing up for this one with a completely different outlook.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The Heritage Foundation has made the plan, selected the appointees, sealed the deal. He will barely have to make any personnel decisions. It’s fucking terrifying because it will work so well instead of the constant chaos of last time.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s self filtering. Anyone that’s watched the last 8 years of throwing each and every one of his cronies under the bus, but still jumps at the chance to be next will be loyal enough, at least until he can’t use them anymore.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago
    The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
    Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/26/trump-joe-rogan-podcast

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support