TLDR: Drug dealers in Catalonia have started to adopt GrapheneOS en masse leading to Catalan police suspecting anyone with a Google Pixel is a drug dealer

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’ve used Samsungs for years, but they have gotten too expensive for what I need, so I went for a Pixel this time around. I got issues with it, but mostly because I’m so used to the Samsung universe. Still way better than an Apple.

    I guess I’m a Spanish drug dealer now.

    • PraiseTheSoup@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You went from the biggest name in non-apple phones to the second biggest name in non-apple phones. You’re so brave.

  • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Isn’t it likely the police is kind of right?

    I mean, how many people in that community used grapheneos phones before the drug dealers figured out how good they were for their purposes? So in that community, it’s indeed very likely that a grapheneos user is in a drug gang.

    Does that mean that grapheneos is an issue, or bad? Not at all. But i see a lot of digs at the police here at how dumb they are. But if literally most grapheneos users there are drug dealers, is it dumb? It’s just a plain observation that’s pretty correct.

    And it’s kind of logical that proper open source tools that are not full of spyware are better for also such purposes. Doesn’t make these tools a problem. If a politician would now start a crusade against such operating systems, that i would agree is dumb.

    But i don’t see an issue with police somewhere realizing that drugdealers use a specific tool, and focusing on that. Of course sucks for the couple of regular users there that just do it to have control over their device…

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That really depends on what they do with that information. If people get arrested for having a pixel, that’s a huge issue. If someone merely gets a closer investigation if they’re suspected of another crime, that’s fine.

      The article is light on details.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Pixel has a market share of 1.5%, so they kind of stand out. Also, there is no such thing as “federales” in Spain. Spain is not a federation. If they are talking about National Police or Guardia civil, they go through a pretty hard entrance exam, and then have a minimum of one year instruction. Executive ranks must have a university degree. Generally reasonably competent. Mossos (regional) and local police are another story. They are quite a bit less competent.

    • icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think most of the criticism towards police is because they are discriminating based on Google Pixels, which is a completely normal car that you can install GrapheneOS on. It would be like targeting anyone driving a Kia because of the Kia Boys

  • Erik L. Midtsveen 🏴🌈@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Update, July 3, 2025 (11:45 AM ET): The crew behind GrapheneOS is understandably none too pleased about their good name being dragged through the mud, and members are speaking out about these reports from Spain. Over on X, the official GrapheneOS account posts:

    European authoritarians and their enablers in the media are misrepresenting GrapheneOS and even Pixel phones as if they’re something for criminals. GrapheneOS is opposed to the mass surveillance police state these people want to impose on everyone.

    Security is a tool, and can be wielded just as much for good as it can for bad. While some people may see this as an indictment, we’d say it’s more the inevitable consequence of GrapheneOS just being very, very good at what it does.

    Yeah, when the media is wrong, GrapheneOS out here correcting the media!

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well I do use a Pixel (for lineage OS) and I do make my living selling drugs… wait wait this is a bad example.

  • Flockwit@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reminds me of when the US tried to fight “terror” by kidnapping people and shoving them in Gitmo because they were wearing Casio watches, which is apparently a brand favoured by terrorists.

  • Part4@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Police are not the brightest in any society.

    So I guess somebody needs to tell them that they need to focus their efforts a little better if their current plan is ‘anyone with a Google Pixel is a drug dealer’.

    Can I suggest they start with the people with drugs, rather than the people with the – not uncommon - google phones in their search for drug dealers?

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Police are not the brightest in any society.

      It’s a literal job requirement. If you’re smart, you’re not going to blindly follow orders. Police cognitive testing literally discards candidates that perform well in intellectual tasks. This is not a conspiracy or a joke, it’s how police works.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Been on it for ~2 years and never going back, fuck Google, fuck the government.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve also been using it for like 2 years but I really want the hardware of something like the Fairphone. A fairphone or something similar with Graphene would be amazing

        • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can technically put GrapheneOS on a Fairphone, but it’s not officially supported.

          Long term, the GOS team is looking to branch off from their reliance on Pixels.

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          The Graphene OS people have always been talking about how they eventually intend to develop their own hardware. So, possibly they will make something good eventually.

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          True, with the intention of installing Graphene OS on it. No other options.

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Strange that google is the only option for the only “secure” operating system.
            Hey, do you know what is Ring Level minus One ?

            • Mike@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Strange that google is the only option for the only “secure” operating system.

              The have their reasons: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

              Hey, do you know what is Ring Level minus One ?

              I know you’re only trolling here and I’m feeding into it, but you nerd sniped me just right to explain why your question is stupid on multiple fronts.

              First of all, “Ring -1” is the hypervisor, at least on virtualization-capable devices (which modern Pixels are), and the hypervisor will be Linux’s KVM in this case, which is open source and compiled by the Graphene team as part of the kernel from source.

              Secondly, Arm (which is the architecture basically all phone chips use, including Pixels) has a slightly different model of security, where apps are Exception Level 0, the OS is EL1, the hypervisor is EL2, and the “secure monitor” (or management firmware) is EL3 (and is probably what you were trying to refer to).

              So yeah, I don’t think you know what “Ring -1” is. At least not enough to warrant a snarky comment.

              • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                “-1” is not just hypervisors, things like Intel Management and AMD Platform Security Processor can peer into system memory. I have no doubt similar system exist on ARM, I suspect the radio transceiver can also read system memory and read secrets out of the security devices.

                I don’t think modern phones are trustable devices. They are opaque blackboxes, pretending to have high security but this security only really protects the spyware operators from being notices.

                I don’t think it’s coincidence that the most “secure” and “private” operating system only operates on a very narrow model selection of phones from just one manufacturer. Probably because they have the best technology to keep the inherent backdoor invisible and implausible. A backdoor to a system nobody trusts wouldn’t be very useful.

                • Zetta@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  The original post is about how it’s so secure the piggies can’t get in. Unless the super secret backdoor is only for the shadow government to disappear dissidents with no trace, thus keeping their super secret backdoor secret.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Reminds me of getting a notice in Middle School, decades ago, about how a pager was considered “drug paraphernalia”

    There was also a big Bloomberg-Era push by the NYPD to arrest any woman carrying condoms on her person, on the grounds that a woman carrying a condom must be a sex worker.

    • icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Everything I hear about Bloomberg make me question how he ran as a democrat, and then I remember he fits the democratic party better than anyone else…

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        NYC’s greatest act was tricking everyone into thinking it’s a progressive city. I am interested in Mamdani at least.

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hey, the security is nice, but I really like the detailed control over notifications, GMS prompts, and network access. When I used PixelOS, my phone did things I didn’t want it to, and it was hard or impossible to make it stop. On GrapheneOS, the defaults are a pretty good experience. I even recommend it to non-techies since they can use it with the Google apps and its still a more respectful experience, even if they don’t need or want the level of control that I like.

    • nroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      TL; DR-- There are many good reasons for regular people to prefer GrapheneOS

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Sure, but they’re also not especially likely to be a drug dealer. I’m a GrapheneOS user and bought the Pixel specifically for it, and I’ve never done drugs in my life, much less traffic in them.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The police: ‘We’ve encountered a difficulty with our paid spying software. Welp it must be just the criminals.’

    Edit: Missed the R and hit the T on our.

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    304
    ·
    2 days ago

    Basically, if you don’t have a phone the cops can easily backdoor, you must be a criminal.

    “What do you have to hide?” taken to it’s logical conclusion.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Humans are apes desiring power, there’s no excuse under which you can give it to them. They’ll invent authority giving them right to judge you and think they are in the right.

      Also why I absolutely despise the Silicon Valley - it’s many such people who think they are the elite now. I want that place detroited as soon as possible. Zuckerberg prosecuted for all the murders he’s committed (I’m certain there are plenty, a person with ASPD with such power just can’t be anything else) which are now unknown, Brin and other jerks playing “cooperating with legal elected authorities” while giving them something with no mandate whatsoever feeling themselves powerful - prosecuted for high treason, all these playing censorship and recommendation - prosecuted for scams on the scale of billions, yadda-yadda.

      Cops saying this should be immediately sued for inciting hate or defamation or whatever against people who don’t want to be backdoored.

      I have a right to not be surveilled, they don’t have a right to surveil me.

      Anyway, I might all the time fly a weird trajectory between various ideologies, but they are all anarchist and Silicon Valley bosses are all thieves.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        they are all anarchist and Silicon Valley bosses are all thieves.

        Nothing is ever absolute, but Silicon Valley has been going in a consistently bad direction for 20+ years now.

  • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is the best recommendation for a phone I’ve seen yet.

    Thanks catalonian police