• Pendorilan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Games are 70 and 80 dollars now. Young people can’t afford them. I can’t either, but I would refuse to pay that price regardless, anyway.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a two part answer.

    One, gamers have less money to spend, along with everyone else.

    Two, expensive AAA title games these days tend to be shit, from a graphics, code, community, and content standpoint. If you want good games, cheaper is usually better.

    Last AAA title game I bought was Borderlands 3, and I don’t see myself buying anymore in the next two years or so.

    • ksigley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I lost my last nerve with Gearbox when I had to figure out how to remove ads in a Borderlands game. No way they’re going to subject me to an ad for a game I would have otherwise bought.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Don’t forget about microtransactions, they might be a significant portion of the decline.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is why publisher’s are trying to derail “Stop Killing Games.”

      When they are done with a a game the don’t WANT you to continue to play and enjoy it…

      …they want you to forget about it and buy the next product they have and financially engage with the microtransaction ecosystem

  • poke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    The hobby is getting more expensive while income left over after cost of living is going down. This shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love the constant onslaught of articles that are like “people aren’t spending money anymore!!!” Open your damn eyes. We all got smart and refuse to pay $80 (which is now the new forced norm for “AAA” garbage) and are replaying oldies and indies. Hell, I revamped my 3DS and have dumped a ton of games onto it. I can even play some of them online with people again via Pretendo.

    Like all of the reasons are so obvious why people aren’t dumping money into this industry anymore. Capitalists fucked it all up and put profit over fun. We’re not all dipshits that fall for the constant micro transactions and grifts.

    I legit don’t give a single shit about any of the new “AAA” games coming out. Give me a call when they’re in the bargain bin years from now.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly this. The new game cycle these days is:

      • Game is announced with shiny video showing all sorts of cool stuff.
      • Release date is announced.
      • Game is delayed.
      • Reviewers/early access people get it, turns out it has none of the cool stuff form the announcement video.
      • Game is delayed again.
      • Game finally comes out, with 3 different tiers that are like $80, $100 and $120 CAD depending on if you want the version of the game that’s 30%, 40% or 50% complete.
      • Game doesn’t work.
      • After about two years and 10 DLC packs you have about 80% of the functional game, the other 20% being stuff they were supposed to add but just never bothered, what are you gonna do about it? By this point you no longer care about the game anyway.
      • Sequel is announced with shiny video showing all sorts of cool stuff, devs promise they’ve fixed all the broken stuff this time for real.
      • Company gets bought by EA or Epic, all devs are replaced.
      • Game is delayed.

      Like genuinely who wants to bother with that nonsense anymore TBH.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Give me a call when they’re in the bargain bin years from now.

      If they’re still functional, thankfully there’s the Stop Killing Games movement.

      • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I think the decline is a drop in a bucket considering. I know plenty of people still buying the Switch 2 etc. on launch day.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m not young or American, but I can tell gaming has been changing. I can’t even remember what was the last “AAA” game I bought, because it must have been a couple of years ago.

    Most games I buy are 40€ connoisseur titles or 20€ indie games. I don’t hear about any “must-play” AAA titles through the grapevine these days. I do hear about interesting indie stuff all the time, though. Most of the 60€+ games I hear about are kind of niche stuff.

    • Doom@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Any AAA game I got in the last decade I waited till it was dirt cheap. Red Dead 2 was the last one I bought and played through was maybe 15-20 bucks or something?

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    We can’t justify the price. The end. That’s it.

    I was super interested in the Dune game, then they decided to not participate in the stream sale. Okay. Too bad. Life goes on. Get fucked, greedy devs.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Nitpick: It’s probably not the devs so much as the capitalist owners and management collaborators. I’d guess most of the people making the games would be happy to have someone play their game at all. It’s not like they typically get a cut of the profits (again: capitalism)

      • Pendorilan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        It’s the publishers. They’re in control of any discounts or sales. Steam sale or otherwise.

    • Alaik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Eh. I know what all PvP centric games turn into unless you’re willing to devote a fuckton of hours into it and get into a great guild. I’ll pass.

    • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I will say though, if you’re the kind of guy who likes MMOs and RPGs (like me) you’ll love dune.

      I used to play a ton of RuneScape back in the day, and recently I’ve been playing Eve and Star Citizen but dune is just a better game in every possible way than those three. I’ve been so obsessed that I had to uninstall it this week so I could get to sleep on time for work haha

  • rustyricotta@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    In addition to other’s comments, I think that we just have enough good games by now that a lot of people can find a game they enjoy enough to sink hundreds or thousands of hours into. Minecraft, Factory, Satisfactory, Hollow Knight, Elden Ring, etc.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depression has me not so interested in playing games anymore. Reading instead. Gaming is losing its magic for me. I’m 36.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s fun how when you could really most use a reliable distraction you start to not be able to find joy in things you used to.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That’s when you play PvP games that piss you off so much sadness goes to anger, which can be a nice distraction.

  • r3g3n3x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t wait till the indie wave wakes up the realization that there is a goldmine of 90s games that were incredible. Star control 2 for one could probably be mistaken for a new indie hit nowadays.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    252
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Looks at:

    1. AAA games costing 100€+ between base game and season pass.

    2. Online services on consoles constantly raising prices.

    3. Consoles that, over the time cost more instead of less.

    4. Wages frozen in time for years.

    5. Rest of unrelated to videogames stuff but that drain people’s wages.

    I WONDER WHY YOUNG PEOPLE SPEND LESS IN VIDEOGAMES…

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also competition, and I’m not actually talking about indie games, although that’s helping. Competition with older games. Why in the world would someone pay $80 for a mediocre new game when they could replay a classic hit that they haven’t played in few years? When was the last time you played the witcher 3, or the mass effect trilogy? Would you rather replay one of those, or pay $80 for the new assassin’s creed?

      • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        2 days ago

        Or even better, play an old game that you still haven’t played. I can get titanfall 2 for the price of a coffee and play it for the first time if I’m craving for a good AAA fps.

        • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh shiiiit, do that and come back and talk to us when you get to the time travel level.

          Are we just in the phase of the medium where technology isn’t the defining quality. It would be slightly weird to try to stay at the forefront of, say, novels without any regard for reading classics. Why shouldn’t games be the same?

        • TachyonTele@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 days ago

          The single player is pretty good in that. It’s definitely worth trying out.

          Being in the giant mech doesn’t feel any different than not being in it though. That’s my only complaint.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I remember at the time titanfall came out, the mechs moving like a human was a selling point. I do agree though it is odd to experience when its not a novelty.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m current stuck in a long term cycle of mainly Project Zomboid, Factorio, Valheim, Oxygen Not Included, The Lone Dark and Rimworld, were when I’m fed up of playing the last of them, it’s been long enough since I played the first one that it’s once interesting to play it.

        Even when I manage to be fed up with playing all of them at any one point, I still have other progression games with complex emergent gameplay (often but not always games which have algorithmically generated game areas) like Kenshi. 7 Days to Die or OpenTTD that pull me in and if that fails, I can always pick up one of the old open world roleplay jewels such as Skyrim and play that.

        I’ve barelly tried anything else in the last couple of years and of those only Oxygen Not Include was the only one with any lasting power and I picked that one years ago.

        It’s not even because I can’t afford it (though out of principl I refuse to pay more than €20 for a game) - whenever I try an AAA game nowadays (always games that came out years ago) it’s almost invariably an inferior experience that either feels too constrained or doesn’t have enough gameplay variety and complexity to be fun for long.

      • ghosthacked@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I replay TLOU, TLOU 2 and Days Gone yearly.

        I used to play new big AAA games, but none of them seem interesting these days.

        I’d rather replay old games that are top tier than waste time on mediocre new crap.

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s also lots of (frequently not even that) old games that I never got around to/never heard about that I can now get on sale for 5$ or whatever, so it’s not always a matter of replaying.

      • clif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just (re) started Dead Space after not playing it for 10-15 years. Still good, still enjoy, why buy when I can just replay games I’ve forgotten the story to?

        Same for Control a few months ago… And I’m sure others.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That and broad, massive economic collapse in basically every other sector, at least in the US.

      Can’t play vidya gaem if hev no food starve.

      https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/02/adp-jobs-report-june-2025.html

      Oops.

      Labor market (# of actual jobs) is now actually net contracting, shrinking.

      Expected: +100k jobs

      Reality: -33k jobs

      Firings / Layoffs > Hiring.

      Also the population grows, so uh, it actually has to be something like +200k to +250k to remain steady in terms of working age people vs jobs.

      Sure, there are lots of ‘job openings’, but they’re all fake ghost job bullshit that never actually hire anyone.

      And they don’t pay enough to bother doing them, and they have insane requirements that make no sense.

      Great Depression 2.0 Gaming!

      (The housing market is also collapsing if any readers haven’t been paying attention.

      My semi-educated guess is about a 55% drop by 24 months from now, compared to roughly '23-'24 highs.

      Hope your boomer parents didn’t buy in the last 5 years rofl!)

      • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        BLS jobs report was a beat, +140k jobs and unemployment down a shade. I agree with you on the themes but it doesn’t help to cherry pick data.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The BLS jobs estimate report is utterly garbage data.

          Go look back over the last year or two.

          Look at how many times, and how many jobs they revised down from the report 1 or 2 months prior.

          All the idiots that watch Jim Cramer for financial advice are the same idiots that never bother to follow up on the BLS revisions.

          Also, the BLS jobs estimate is an estimate that goes through a whole bunch of layers of dependency on other statistics like estimated populations growth.

          Meanwhile the ADP is much more directly based on actual payrolls, from actual money going out to actual employees.

          You should maybe learn how to actually compare the methodologies behind various sources of data before you accuse someone of cherry picking.

          Also the unemployment rates that are widely reported on don’t count people who’ve been unemployed so long that they fall out of the labor force.

          In our modern economy, if you fall off the treadmill, you stay unemployed for that long, you’ll likely never get hired in that field again, or at least not without having to start out at an entry level or junior position, because of how absurd companies are with job requirements, how every job opening has 1000 applicants in 72 hrs, how something like 2/3rds of those job openings are fake and will never hire anyone.

          https://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylrobinson/2025/04/02/why-no-one-is-hiring-you-and-its-not-your-resume/

          • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            What are you talking about? They’re both estimates extrapolated from samples. I think most statisticians would prefer stratified sampling over one company’s payrolls processing, but whatever. Maybe chuds would argue that ADP is so much more efficient/accurate because it’s outside of the “swamp” of govt, it’s certainly an independent data point. I mean I agree with you in that BLS is not reliable either. Real time economics is hard.

            If you honestly preferred ADP all along and will continue to espouse it’s superiority when it next contradicts your view rather than confirming it (as it will because data are noisy) then more power to you.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Well now you’ve met a statistician, a person with an Econ degree, specialization in Econometrics who is telling you the BLS numbers have been garbage for 2 years, based off of how many revisions they have to keep doing, and the magnitude of those adjustments.

              I’ve been a professional data analyst at multiple large companies for years, I’m not going to explain this further unless you want to pay me for the full 40 page methodology breakdown.

              Real time economics is not hard for me, it was my career until I retired.

              Damn near every single measurable metric in the US economy beyond what’s in the most easy to consume, most non specialist oriented media is screaming that everything is going tits up.

              Hey when was the last time the Fed had to significantly jump into the Repo market to bail it out?

              Oh, right, it was this past week.

              I’m not going to bother to list out every single indicator/methodology I consider because 1) I’d break the lemmy comment post character limit (its 10k, btw) and 2) I’m used to being paid for such detail.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Studies conducted at my desk and on my couch have also found a downward trend in video game quality.

    • redsunrise@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m a pretty conservative game purchaser. I’ve never paid over $40 for a game (including games on sale) because there are so, so many amazing indie games on Steam that charge so little for many hours of fun.

      When I see a AAA game come out, I know it’s going to be profit-driven, uninspired, and rushed because it exists solely for the purpose of making money for a large corp. For that reason (among others), I avoid them altogether because I know my dollar goes way further going toward an independent developer who makes games for passion (and only sometimes for money). The passion always shines through in their work, unlike passionless AAA games.

    • MangoPenguin@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t forget all the online requirements with accounts even if you want to play single player, and constant server issues on launch that seem to happen with every game now because none of them allow community servers anymore.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The death of community servers is why I stopped playing multiplayer.

        The gaming landscape was just so much better back when communities were able to self-host and moderate before matchmaking and corporate automated moderation became the norm.

        • MangoPenguin@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I still play multiplayer, but on games that still support community servers like Minecraft, Enshrouded, Arma 3, Space Engineers…

          • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            How has Enshrouded been doing? I haven’t been able to get on my PC in almost a year and only got to play it on initial release.

            • MangoPenguin@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              It’s good, there’s been a few major updates adding new zones, better NPCs, animals, more gear/weapons, and so on…

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, the games market was brought up a lot by the global pandemic and had to come down eventually.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, with the speed that games have been coming out the last 20 years, there’s always something on sale to play