• Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I have given up on the idea of retirement or security/safety in my lifetime a loooong time back. We live in the worst possible type of dystopia, a world where “evil” won long ago, and has had ample time and opportunity to sink its claws into every aspect of our lives, forever.

      And the worst part is that most people won’t even believe it. In fact, almost a majority seem to relish it somehow. Like they want the world to be as terrible as it can possibly be, even for themselves.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        And their kids. I couldn’t imagine setting them up for life like this. Then again perhaps they dont really care about them beyond having the “reproduce” achievement unlocked.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          My personal take is that the super-elite know there’s no saving our biosphere in our lifetimes so they’re just robbing what they can while they still can.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      If your mental health is in that kind of state, please get rid of the gun. The world is better with you here, and we need each other the fight that’s coming.

      And if we need guns later, I’m a hobbyist that’s been collecting them for years and I’ve got a TON of them.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Yes, please, no matter how you feel right now if you are super depressed and you buy a gun anyways, keep it at a friend’s or family member’s place who has guns that you trust, there is no shame in that hell everyone understands, let them have it and go to the range and stuff to target shoot and have fun together as a way of connecting.

        Don’t keep it in your house, with ammunition.

        Life is really fucking hard right now and brutal permanent choices are almost always a bad idea.

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          That analogy would work if people were genuinely as identical, thoughtless and replaceable as grains of rice.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Grains of rice don’t live, don’t love, don’t build relationships and societies with each other. People do.

          Take your ice cream koan elsewhere.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I hope they consider overdosing on opiates instead. Put to sleep, probably the only way I’ll know true peace

      • ludicolo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        That is such a funny fucking joke you made there old buddy old pal. “We got out of them” no we didn’t you fool do you see where we are now?? This has been a build up of events that have happened before. Ignoring that is just plain ignorant and dangerous to the situation at hand, we got here because we never truly “got out of them”.

        By all means fight the good fight and keep your friends, families, and neighbors safe. However, we need to stop placating people with this rhetoric.

      • Sunflier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Are we beyond the point of protests yet? Our politicians are actively taking affirmative steps to avoid listening to them.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          We have been far past that point for a long while but nobody cares.
          Peaceful weekend protests might make people feel like they’re doing something but are not successful. You have to disrupt the economy for people to notice general strikes massive protests.

        • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Did anyone protest when Philadelphia police dropped bombs on their own city in 1985 to kill black people? Didn’t think so.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Oh I will, all the way up to age 60. I’m not going to wait quietly for old age. I have lots of time to flick off conservatives.

        But do I actually have any hope at all?

        nope!

        • takeda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Our problem is apathy. It is much more of us than them.

          If we succeed and still have democracy the laws can be reverted, but as I mentioned the apathy is the biggest problem and the reason how we got where we are.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            Our problem is apathy

            No, that doesn’t ring true to me even though I hear everyone say it including myself sometimes when I get frustrated.

            I think our problem is much more unsettling, our problem is believing being as busy and productive as possible is a sufficient placeholder for boredom, for apathy, for space to understand and let others exploit resources we could have raced to first but left as a gift and that the genocide of indigenous peoples and cultures all over the world is a desperate attempt to make us forget the wisdom and power of letting things be.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    This is the kind of thing that could lead to the chop chops. But, don’t worry guys. I’m sure it’ll trickle down any day now.

    • Ænima@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Too bad the republican propaganda machine will blame Biden or brown people or something else, that this is going to remove freeloaders and make the gutted programs save them money. Even if they personally lose their healthcare, somehow it’ll be the democrats that made it that bad. Somehow…

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Senseless killing is a superficial solution. Organization is the sustainable, but less glamurous one.

        • 0xD@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Not with that attitude. Seems like MAGA succeeded in organizing sufficiently.

          What are you gonna do? Kill all CEOs? And then? Kill all politicians? And then? Police? Military? Dissidents? Do you just keep killing? How do you handle the resulting societal trauma?

          How exactly do you think any of that can achieve sustainable, progressive change?

            • 0xD@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 days ago

              So what do you propose? What are the logistics of it? How do you organize to take out enough systems to take over? What do you do afterwards?

              Life isn’t some fantastical action story, it’s the incredibly complex reality we all live in where a single person cannot fathom all the variables therein. You are not trying to understand, you are not trying to be effective, you’re just circle jerking in your fantasy world. And as long as many people keep doing that, living in some kind of hyper-real abstraction of reality, the people actually smart enough to organize and get into power will be able to do whatever they want. You’re just another enabler.

              • blakenong@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                22 days ago

                All you have is “organize” or “awareness.” Your action plan is as circle jerky as ours. My guess is you like the direction the country is going in.

                My personal solution is to get out of the house and watch it burn from the neighbor’s yard.

                • 0xD@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  I don’t live in your fash country and no, I absolutely despise the way your country is going in and pulling the rest of the world into hell :)

                  What I have is political activism in a leftist party where I am helping get new members and organizing various events teaching about democracy and its tools, amongst other things, as well as supporting other groups and bettering the local community.

                  What you have is fear and a desire to feel good about yourself whilst doing and achieving nothing. You’d rather fuck off than pull through on your mighty words - that’s also called cowardice.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Senseless killing is a superficial solution. Organization is the sustainable, but less glamorous one.

  • breecher@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Considering the entire history of the US is one big upwards transfer of wealth, that is really saying something.

    • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      The floodwaters can only be dammed so long before breaking free. Whether that happens via controlled release of pressure or a disastrous blow out is up to the people with the regulatory power. Their failure to address the tide can only end in their painful ruin. For their sake, they better have fast legs if they don’t grow some hearts.

      • Sunflier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        It’s less that the regulators are failing to do their jobs and more that regulators are being given toddlers’ first toolset to do the job that requires some high end tools.

        • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Sorry, my intent was to apply the label of “regulator” to the publicly elected officials and ghouls controlling the course of this legislation (i.e. regulating society). I are engineer, so sometimes I mix my lingo and analogies.

    • malin@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      That’s okay.

      We’ll take the futures from their offspring.

      This will not go unpunished.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    The largest upward transfer of wealth in history… so far.

    Not counting the ones during Covid or 2008.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      The Largest Upward Transfer of Wealth in American History

      House Republicans voted to advance a bill that would offer lavish tax cuts for the rich while slashing benefits for the poor. By Jonathan Chait House Speaker Mike Johnson Kevin Dietsch / Getty May 22, 2025, 9:21 AM ET

      House Republicans worked through the night to advance a massive piece of legislation that might, if enacted, carry out the largest upward transfer of wealth in American history.

      That is not a side effect of the legislation, but its central purpose. The “big, beautiful bill” would pair huge cuts to food assistance and health insurance for low-income Americans with even larger tax cuts for affluent ones.

      Hakeem Jeffries, the House minority leader, warned that the bill’s passage, by a 215–214 margin, would mark the moment the Republicans ensured the loss of their majority in the midterm elections. That may be so. But the Republicans have not pursued this bill for political reasons. They are employing a majority that they suspect is temporary to enact deep changes to the social compact.

      The minority party always complains that the majority is “jamming through” major legislation, however deliberate the process may be. (During the year-long debate over the Affordable Care Act, Republicans farcically bemoaned the “rushed” process that consumed months of public hearings.) In this case, however, the indictment is undeniable. The House cemented the bill’s majority support with a series of last-minute changes whose effects have not been digested. The Congressional Budget Office has not even had time to calculate how many millions of Americans would lose health insurance, nor by how many trillions of dollars the deficit would increase.

      The heedlessness of the process is an indication of its underlying fanaticism. The members of the Republican majority are behaving not like traditional conservatives but like revolutionaries who, having seized power, believe they must smash up the old order as quickly as possible before the country recognizes what is happening.

      House Republicans are fully aware of the political and economic risks of this endeavor. Cutting taxes for the affluent is unpopular, and cutting Medicaid is even more so. That is why, instead of proudly proclaiming what the bill will accomplish, they are pretending it will do neither. House Republicans spent months warning of the political dangers of cutting Medicaid, a program that many of their own constituents rely on. The party’s response is to fall back on wordplay, pretending that their scheme of imposing complex work requirements, which are designed to cull eligible recipients who cannot navigate the paperwork burden, will not throw people off the program—when that is precisely the effect they are counting on to produce the necessary savings.

      The less predictable dangers of their plan are macroeconomic. The bill spikes the deficit, largely because it devotes more money to lining the pockets of lawyers and CEOs than it saves by immiserating fast-food employees and ride-share drivers. Massive deficit spending is not always bad, and in some circumstances (emergencies, or recessions) it can be smart and responsible. In the middle of an economic expansion, with a large structural deficit already built into the budget, it is deeply irresponsible.

      In recent years, deficit spending has been a political free ride. With interest rates high and rising, the situation has changed. Higher deficits oblige Washington to borrow more money, which can force it to pay investors higher interest rates to take on its debt, which in turn increases the deficit even more, as interest payments (now approaching $1 trillion a year) swell. The market could absorb a new equilibrium with a higher deficit, but that resolution is hardly assured. The compounding effect of higher debt leading to higher interest rates leading to higher debt can spin out of control.

      House Republicans have made clear they are aware of both the political and the economic dangers of their plan, because in the recent past, they have repeatedly warned about both. Their willingness to take them on is a measure of their profound commitment.

      And while the content of their beliefs can be questioned, the seriousness of their purpose cannot. Congressional Republicans are willing to endanger their hold on power to enact policy changes they believe in. And what they believe—what has been the party’s core moral foundation for decades—is that the government takes too much from the rich, and gives too much to the poor.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    For republicans, “wealth transfer” is a dirty phrase if used in any shape or form that leans towards fairness, a level playing field, and equality. However, handing money to the already wealthy and fuck everyone else is perfectly acceptable wealth transfer.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I really want this to be it. I want a big enough mass of freak conservative boomers to die off of old age and for the republicans to finally push everyone else hard enough that this country finally fucking snaps and swings left so hard that Reagan’s grave belches black smoke for a month. I hope we swing left so hard that all the Fox News assholes run bawling off to Russia, all the neoliberal dickheads move to their neoliberal paradise of [some offshore oil rig], and we end up fixing all kinds of shit that’s been broken for basically my entire life.

    I know it won’t; we’ll just get a bunch of working class republicans standing around the wreckage and mumbling “can you imagine how much worse it would have been under Biden?” to each other.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Idk, it’s easy to get depressed about it, but I think that there’s another interpretation. It shows that Gen Z recognizes how fucked everything is, and recognize the urgent need for drastic change, which is what Donald promises, even if he’s a colossal piece of shit and the changes he promises are pure grift. Yeah, they’ve been taken in by the right, but only because the right has seized on the populist moment while the institutional left is still fretting about decorum, rank, seniority, process, and literally anything else before results. If the left gets out there and starts swinging for the fences, I think we can turn things around. So, of course, the democrats are preparing to rise to the occasion by offering Gavin Newsom and his plan to build the biggest bulldozers on earth for bulldozing the homeless.

        I think this is part of why Bernie was yelling at people to run for office. We need more options, more people who are willing to turn their back on the establishment, on the left.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I want a big enough mass of freak conservative boomers to die off of old age and for the republicans to finally push everyone else hard enough that this country finally fucking snaps and swings left so hard that Reagan’s grave belches black smoke for a month.

      Look at Mike Johnson’s face–he’s not dying for a long long time. Get over the idea that evil people are all old and you just need to wait for them to die, it’s not going to happen. New evil ones are born every day, they exist in every generation, they’ve been with us forever and will be with us forever.