Let’s just remove all video metadata including author. You just get video that is unskippable and you have to watch it (and ads) before getting a new video. Webcam required to track your eyeballs and the video will only play while you are looking at the screen.

Ah, fair enough and i 100% agree.

You became equals and they want compliant trad wives.

They said they are voting for Harris, and are offering feedback that the Harris texts could be done differently to make them more effective. It’s not the same as being “swayed”

Id feel sorry for anyone who did this manually when it is a relatively simple sentiment analysis project the can be done programmatically. The hardest part would be sourcing the transcripts or audio files (which then could be transcribed programmatically)

That is a complex question but my line of thought is this: artists have accepted legal agreements on how to sell/stream their work and how much they get for it. You as a consumer don’t need to worry about this. If there is a way to buy/stream the product legally then the artist has approved of getting money that way.

Basically i don’t think this should be a point to discourage buying audio and owning it. The alternative is never owning music and tough luck if a song gets pulled because of legal disputes or whatever.

Small aside- Some states split their electoral votes so it would matter there (Nebraska and Maine)

This is a good exercise. Do cows used for veal next

Do you blame him? That is a huge target to have painted on your back. Completely irresponsible to name someone as Satoshi even before you consider financial ramifications