If a human customer service rep [added charges without telling people and lied to them], it’d just be fraud. But being able to blame the computer, that’s the use case for AI!

Potential hot take: In situations where the company attempts to diffuse responsbility, the CEO should take the blame automatically.

Update from Brian Merchant: The first edition of AI Killed My Job has just dropped

It’s all gotta be in the models by now, but it’s gonna be a cool resource for something, right?

It’ll also be helpful for helping the 'Net recover from the slop-nami once AI finally dies.

For once, I’m hoping a megacorp actively squeezes the infringer for everything they’re worth. The looming threat of getting drained dry is the only thing keeping AI fucks from stealing anything they fucking want.

Dan McQuillian just dropped the text of a seminar he gave: The role of the University is to resist AI

Starting this off with Baldur Bjarnason sneering at his fellow techies for their “reading” of Dante’s Inferno:

Reading through my feed reader and seeing tech dilettantes “doing” Dante in a week and change, I’m reminded of the time in university when we spent half a semester discussing Dante’s Divine Comedy, followed by tracing it’s impact and influence over the centuries

I don’t think these assholes even bother to read their footnotes, and their writing all sounds like it comes from ChatGPT. Naturally so, because I believe them when they claim they don’t use it for writing. They’re just genuinely that dull

At least read the footnotes FFS

If they were reading Dante for pleasure, that’d be different—genuinely awesome, even. But all of this is framed as doing the entirety of “humanities” in the space of a few weeks.

Exploiting software copyright could be profitable, but to my knowledge its an unproven method. At this moment, they’re probably eyeing the fact that defense spending is ballooning worldwide and thinking “there’s some easy money to made”.

Either that, or put their money into defence and make a quick killing off of all the war breaking out.

Unlike any other work, code comes with its own built in, essentially irremovable “watermark” in the form of security exploits. In several thousands lines of code, there would be enough “watermark” for identification.

To give an example, Warner Brothers got sued by Bethesda for stealing code from Fallout Shelter when making their Westworld mobile game, with Bethesda pointing to a bug that appeared in early versions of FO Shelter as evidence of stolen code.

Although that does suggest a new dunk on computer touchers, of the AI enthusiast kind, you can point at that and say that coding clearly does not require any logical reasoning.

Considering how many actual programmers fell for botshit and autoplag, it probably never did. That’s probably being a bit harsh, but I feel this bubble’s shown that your ability to puke out computational word salad does not translate into having any sort of useful skill.

The whole history of “artificial intelligence” since 1955 is making impressive demos that you can’t use for real work. Then they cut your funding off and it’s AI Winter again.

I’ve found myself wondering if I was being overly harsh in calling artificial intelligence a pseudoscience. Clearly, I was not.

New article from Axos: Publishers facing existential threat from AI, Cloudflare CEO says

Baldur Bjarnason has given his commentary:

Honestly, if search engine traffic is over, it might be time for blogs and blog software to begin to deny all robots by default

Anyways, personal sidenote/prediction: I suspect the Internet Archive’s gonna have a much harder time archiving blogs/websites going forward.

Up until this point, the Archive enjoyed easy access to large swathes of the 'Net - site owners had no real incentive to block new crawlers by default, but the prospect of getting onto search results gave them a strong incentive to actively welcome search engine robots, safe in the knowledge that they’d respect robots.txt and keep their server load to a minimum.

Thanks to the AI bubble and the AI crawlers its unleashed upon the 'Net, that has changed significantly.

Now, allowing crawlers by default risks AI scraper bots descending upon your website and stealing everything that isn’t nailed down, overloading your servers and attacking FOSS work in the process. And you can forget about reigning them in with robots.txt - they’ll just ignore it and steal anyways, they’ll lie about who they are, they’ll spam new scrapers when you block the old ones, they’ll threaten to exclude you from search results, they’ll try every dirty trick they can because these fucks feel entitled to steal your work and fundamentally do not respect you as a person.

Add in the fact that the main upside of allowing crawlers (turning up in search results) has been completely undermined by those very same AI corps, as “AI summaries” (like Google’s) steal your traffic through stealing your work, and blocking all robots by default becomes the rational decision to make.

This all kinda goes without saying, but this change in Internet culture all-but guarantees the Archive gets caught in the crossfire, crippling its efforts to preserve the web as site owners and bloggers alike treat any and all scrapers as guilty (of AI fuckery) until proven innocent, and the web becomes less open as a whole as people protect themselves from the AI robber barons.

On a wider front, I expect this will cripple any future attempts at making new search engines, too. In addition to AI making it piss-easy to spam search systems with SEO slop, any new start-ups in web search will struggle with quality websites blocking their crawlers by default, whilst slop and garbage will actively welcome their crawlers, leading to your search results inevitably being dogshit and nobody wanting to use your search engine.

…Honestly, I can’t help but feel you’re on to something. I’d have loved to believe this was an honest thought experiment, but after seeing the right openly wage a war on empathy as a concept, I wouldn’t be shocked if Roko’s Basilisk (and its subsequent effects) weren’t planned from the start.

ZITRON DROPPED (sadly, its premium)

Darwin Award-as-a-service

Lying machines have no place in anything involving facts or knowledge. Get the fuck out.

LGBT neo-nazis

New Tante piece: “ChatBot” is bad design

Idk personally i kind of expect the ai makers to have at least had the sense to allow their bots to process math with a calculator and not guesswork. That seems like, an absurdly low bar both for testing the thing as a user as well as a feature to think of.

You forget a few major differences between us and AI makers.

We know that these chatbots are low-quality stochastic parrots capable only of producing signal shaped noise. The AI makers believe their chatbots are omniscient godlike beings capable of solving all of humanity’s problems with enough resources.

The AI makers believe that imitating intelligence via guessing the next word is equivalent to being genuinely intelligent in a particular field. We know that a stochastic parrot is not intelligent, and is incapable of intelligence.

AI makers believe creativity is achieved through stealing terabytes upon terabytes of other people’s work and lazily mashing it together. We know creativity is based not in lazily mashing things together, but in taking existing work and using our uniquely human abilities to transform them into completely new works.

We recognise the field of Artificial Intelligence as a pseudoscience. The AI makers are full believers in that pseudoscience.

Posted this on a Discord I’m in - one of the near immediate responses was “I’m glad they made a non-invasive procedure to lobotomise people”.

Nothing more to add, I just think that’s hilarious