• PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    €70 for an almost 10 year old game, which is locked to 30 FPS, often looks worse than the original, swapped out songs for worse picks. Overall seems like a downgrade.

    No thanks.

    • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would understand if these were at least remotely similar games, but these don’t make much sense lol

      • ekZepp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        If you stop a second to consider the absurdity to sell a 10-year-old title at an higher price of triple-A games released this year. Maybe it does.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    The only thing that makes sense in my head as to why Until Dawn is underperforming is the game’s lack of promotion. Aside from a couple of trailers, I have barely seen Sony promote this remaster.

    Couldn’t possibly be that people don’t want to keep paying new game prices for remasters…

    People live rebuying decade old console exclusives on the next console generation.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Whenever people say this, I imagine they have adblockers on YouTube?

      I can’t say I have strong reasoning for it, but I’ve never set that up, and I’ve gotten a bunch of ad spam around the release…