• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    5 hours ago

    All he’s doing is making worse trains and busses. This isn’t innovative. Its a waste of fucken time. Make trains and busses.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Respectfully, I don’t want to see any trains or buses made under his guidance.

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          My roomie is a trucker. He has laughed so much at the Tesla semitruck because it kind of fails at everything a truck is meant to do.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Technically, it’s far less explosive than a gasoline powered vehicle. However, batteries are very hard to extinguish if they catch fire.

          • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Any fires are the product of a technical malfunction, and those are very easy to either mitigate, and, especially, engineer beyond.

            Gasoline will always be flammable, and using it as a fuel source will always present certain concerns and risks. Measured against battery technology, however, it’s kind of a no-brainer as to which is much more safe.

            Even Toyota’s hydrogen fuel cells (unquestionably more explosive than any battery or gasoline powered vehicle) are now technically safer than gasoline powered vehicles, just because of their amazing containment pods for the hydrogen fuel. Again, this sort of thing is just an engineering problem, not a problem with developing new resources and/or new techniques of harnessing their energy output.