For one second I thought they threw the vandals in the river.
For one second I thought they threw the vandals in the river.
They are themselves an ad company though.
They couldn’t find a better AI image generator? Or like… hire a human or buy some stock images?
(Only certain users, and only if you consent)
Ah, very nice!
At this point stuff like this isn’t oniony anymore, just trump supporters being trump supporters.
What is the difference between this and https://opencollective.com/
Yes, and if you complain to much they’ll put the power input on the bottom too next year.
Not that I know of
Ah, u fortunately you got infected by a plastic virus, luckily, for only $999 a day you can install norton directly into your hearth to live a day longer (:
I can’t think of any reason to attack that website, what have they done wrong?
I tried making something like this for lemmy, kinda cool to see how theirs works.
They’re 100% only doing this for money, but still, nice to see them in the right for once.
A new canidate will be picked during the DNC on 19-22 august.
I will indeed rephrase the first rule, good suggestion!
If you have a whitelist, you don’t need a blacklist, so I don’t fully understand what you mean with that. The problem with having a whitelist is that I think it’s to much work to curate each news source, and could be seen as restricting if not enough are whitelisted. That’s why we’ll probably go for a blacklist.
Yea, the bot already has some problems with that. But we’ll first ask questions, then delete, so no worries there.
Good suggestion, I’ll discuss it with the other moderators.
That catch all rule is already included in the instance rules, so that’s not really needed.
Thank you for the suggestions (:
I’m gonna grab slimerancher.