• Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I believe it was you who was talking about primaries, of which I pointed out that Harris never won any - even the one I “don’t like”. She participated in exactly one primary and had her ass handed to her.

      Your argument was that Bernie obviously can’t win a general because he couldn’t win a primary. Do you, or do you not, apply that same logic to Harris, and did you oppose her nomination in 2024? Your argument is ridiculous in either case, but you could at least apply it consistently.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Now that was definitely not a primary, not even a checking the box primary. That was a coronation, and the very event I asked if you opposed.

          Anyways, it’s absolutely clear to anyone seeing this that you’re just a hack and not a serious person. I knew from the onset that was the best to be achieved.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Sure buddy, call that a primary if you want. I’m not trying to convince you of anything. Believe what you want, and don’t worry that you’re not respected for it.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  The whole reason we are discussing primaries is that you (incorrectly) believe they indicate electability in the general. How exactly does a primary where the citizens didn’t get to vote for the “winning” candidate do that? Not very well apparently.