"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoControversial questionlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up11.58Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.57Karrow-down1external-linkControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·4 days agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·3 days agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.