• Batman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    You never have to hire anyone because of affirmative action. Simply hire the best people for the job without regard to gender and your fine. That’s how it’s always worked.

    The only difference between a woman and a man is they are in a protected class. So them suing when you hire chet from the country club even though he has less experience, is easier.

    If you don’t see the connection to sov cits, I’m lost

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Okay. I’ll hire based on what genitals a person was lotteried with. Seems fair, I guess?

        We live in a progressive world that hires for boobies and pee-pees! The starving so-and-so that grew up poor, uneducated, and trodden on, but garnered the skills and experienc in defiance can get fucked. Oh, unless coincidentally they meet the quota. That’d be nice.

        • GarrulousBrevity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          You don’t read good. Quotas are quite illegal. That’s the disingenuous argument of someone who doesn’t like having to answer why they thought the most qualified candidate was most qualified in had talked about.

          Also, you responded this to a joke about not picking the guy throwing around random sovcit accusations? Man, you two deserve each other

          • saltesc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            It’s been a hectic 24 hours and I’m confused.

            Sorry if I came off as a twat, I need sleep.