More than 200,000 people had canceled their digital subscriptions by midday Monday, according to two people at the paper with knowledge of internal matters. Not all cancellations take effect immediately. Still, the figure represents about 8% of the paper’s paid circulation of 2.5 million subscribers, which includes print as well. The number of cancellations continued to grow Monday afternoon.

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m glad this happens in a world where newspapers endorse candidates, but I also don’t get why newspapers are allowed to endorse candidates in the first place. I guess that is the least of our concerns when you look at media bias, but still…

    • Tinks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Newspapers are allowed to endorse candidates because the first amendment protects free speech. While I may agree with you that endorsements and news media stumping for ANY candidate is problematic and reeks of propaganda, it is, for better or worse, protected by the constitution.

    • Baguette@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I mean when the choice is either facism or democracy, I’d assume being unbiased is a little hard. After all, the nazis did attack the press first to instill propaganda.