• HouseWolf@lemm.eeEnglish
    2·
    2 months ago

    When I was first looking into Linux I asked the only friend I knew who used it and he unironically recommended me Arch…

    A year later I actually gave Arch a try, but by then he apparently hated Arch and switched to Gentoo and I stopped asking him for advice at that point.

    • TwilightKiddy@programming.devEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      I switched from Arch to Gentoo, for me it’s just the next step of taking advantage of every last bit of my hardware. But unless you are seriously invested, I would never recommend Gentoo to someone. If you just want something that’s up to date, go with Fedora. If you have some spare time, go with Arch. If you have no hobbies at all, go with Gentoo.

      • ragas@lemmy.ml
        1·
        2 months ago

        I dunno, apart from compile times, Gentoo is the simplest distribution ever. I have way more problems with my Arch or Ubuntu (Neon) installations.

        • TwilightKiddy@programming.devEnglish
          0·
          2 months ago

          That depends on what your goals are. And with Gentoo you can have a lot more elaborate goals than with other distros. Mine, for example, was to get rid of initramfs. I spent a week compiling and recompiling the kernel with different configurations before I was able to see a TTY for the first time.

          Of course you can grab your distribution kernel and get default and perfectly safe use flags for everything, but, I would still be an Arch user if that was my jam.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      I have been using Arch for a half a decade at this point and its worked out well for me. I like how its very stable despite being bleeding edge (relatively speaking). It’s made gaming a lot easier, and I was pleasantly surprised when Valve announced SteamOS was switching to it as a base.

      A lot of people have varying levels of purism when it comes to linux, and it sounds like your friend dipped his toes in with Arch and realized “not pure enough” and then jumped in on the deep end with Gentoo. At the end of the day, Linux is Linux no matter which distro you pick, but each distro highlights different strengths and weaknesses of it. Its all about the package managers, the repository contents, and the maintainers. Occasionally, technical support might matter.

      So, pick whichever distro you like, move around a bit to see what has the least papercuts for you, and then stick with that until you can’t anymore.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      0·
      2 months ago

      Honestly the only thing you should probably understand before going with arch is how to properly use the CLI, then the wiki is a breeze

  • hansolo@lemm.eeEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    Who TF is scared by Mint?

    Did a clean upgrade/install of Mint about 10 hours ago. I’m back to business as usual. Minor tweaks, no tinkering.

  • monogram@feddit.nlEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    Mint is goat

    Remember to make a backup pipeline with Timeshift and you’ll be fine

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        0·
        2 months ago

        As long as you have compatible hardware, it’s great. I didn’t bother researching when I built a new server and ended up switching to debian since bsd didn’t support my nic.

    • Entitle9294@lemmy.world
      0·
      2 months ago

      Former. Migrated to linux 20+ years ago because of…Flash support. Didn’t realize back then how quickly Flash would disappear and FreeBSD only supported it via its linux binary compatibility, which stopped working at that time.