Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 30 days agoDeliveryslrpnk.netimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageDeliveryslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 30 days agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squarecheddar@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·30 days agoIt’s like removing a laugh track from an old sitcom.
minus-squareHugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-229 days agoIt’s better, because here the underlying pacing isn’t left ruined after the removal. Removing the laugh track leaves behind (hilariously) awkward gaps. This is what laugh track removal would look like in this case Actually kinda funny still, lol
minus-squareVindictiveJudge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·29 days agoAlso, depending on your definition of ‘old,’ that laugh track might be a live studio audience rather than canned laughter.
minus-squareMaalus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·30 days agoHow do you know it’s funny when there isn’t a comment that says so?
minus-squareRolando@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 days agoI usually agree. HOWEVER… I woke up this morning, opened Lemmy, and saw this post: And I was like… is this a shitpost? Edgy? A joke? Ironic? Skibidi? Is this what skibidi is? I honestly couldn’t tell.
It’s like removing a laugh track from an old sitcom.
It’s better, because here the underlying pacing isn’t left ruined after the removal.
Removing the laugh track leaves behind (hilariously) awkward gaps.
This is what laugh track removal would look like in this case
Actually kinda funny still, lol
Also, depending on your definition of ‘old,’ that laugh track might be a live studio audience rather than canned laughter.
How do you know it’s funny when there isn’t a comment that says so?
I usually agree. HOWEVER… I woke up this morning, opened Lemmy, and saw this post:
And I was like… is this a shitpost? Edgy? A joke? Ironic? Skibidi? Is this what skibidi is? I honestly couldn’t tell.