• pooperNickel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As I learned from some of the tech people in the tech sub, it was looked at and

    Do you mean the post that was removed for breaking rules? The one that attracted a lot of downvotes and a few people dunking on you for obviously being butthurt about something no one has, or owes, an explanation for?

    there are many people banned from that sub with no explanation.

    Two. It was two people. Lol

    I have noticed that it really gets under your skin that you were banned from an entire instance for toxicity. Maybe you can do the research instead of demanding a stranger find out why an admin in the fediverse took the time to specifically ban you and then write “toxic” as the reason. I don’t get paid by you to do this research but maybe you can send me a few hundred USD to do so? In the meantime, if you don’t want to discuss it, I suggest you not bring the issue up again. Thank you!

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you mean the post that was removed for breaking rules?

      Yep. And the rule I broke was the rule that said “no posts asking for technical help.” Which is my bad because I didn’t read the sidebar before posting.

      The one that attracted a lot of downvotes

      No, the one that attracted upvotes and supporters saying that your screenshot indeed showed no proof of my ever having posted to the sub I was banned from. I’m surprised you don’t remember, because you got into an argument with one of the posters who supported me. Do you remember?

      I have noticed that it really gets under your skin that you were banned from an entire instance for toxicity.

      Under my skin?! hahahaha I was banned from a place I never visited, posted on, or even knew existed. LMAO

      So any samples of posts I made to that place? Funny how there are zero instances of me posting to that place in my comment history. Hmmm…

      But as I’ve mentioned several times, I believe we should focus on discussing the content of the articles posted from here on out, in order to keep with the spirit of this community. Thank you!

      • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Rewriting history is so beneath you! It bothered you so little you made two posts about it and at this point probably 50 comments about it LMAO

        Still waiting on that check. Thank you!!!

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t know what you mean. You’re still not talking about the content of the article. Let’s stay focused on the content of the article especially since you’ve had some comments removed for personal attacks today. Thank you!

            • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I have no idea what you are talking about. Can we just stick to the contents of the article posted so that we can stay within the spirit of this community please? Thank you!

              • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I hope you feel better now that we’re no longer talking about your toxicity ban. Thank you!

                • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t know what you mean or what that has to do with this article. Would you like to stay focused on this article so we can keep within the spirit of this community? I think we should. Thank you!