• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    the reason to pick Chinese may be racist (possibly due to the writing system looking complicated) but the thought experiment itself doesn’t have racist connotations imo, and i don’t think it’s stupid either. doesn’t have to involve Chinese or a specific language at all.

    it’s a logical question to ask: if i can mimic speaking in a language to a point that it convinces native speakers, but don’t understand what I’m saying myself, am I considered a genuine speaker of that language? does what i say matter or have any value?

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      well it appears like you’re posting english, but actually you’re posting nonsense

      so the answer to your question is no

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Scientists: weird, we didn’t slip this piece of paper saying “mansplain the chinese room thought experiment” through the door, and yet that’s all the room seems to want to do. I guess we just have to conclude the room is an idiot?

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        what an unnecessarily aggressive comment. mansplain? am i even responding to a woman? also i wasn’t trying to explain it; i was saying the central question doesn’t have to involve a specific language at all and it still a worthy question, especially with all this AI bullshit being pushed all over.