• ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I was reading it and genuinely thought it meant South Asian Indian at first

    • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      My native american father in law prefers to call himself an Indian.

      From his point of view he wouldn’t call himself a “native american” because he belongs to an actual nation and indigenous people aren’t a homogenous group.

      He prefers Indian because it makes white people look bad. Incredibly based

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        A sentiment I’ve heard a bunch is “oh, so you called us Indians and now you’re uncomfortable with that label? Well fuck you, you don’t get to keep unilaterally changing what’s acceptable. If thinking about colonialism makes you uncomfortable, then great! Start sitting with that discomfort and recognising the crumb of self determination that we express by identifying as Indians. You gave us that label, and it’s ours now.”

        • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          So the people trying to make the term more accurate are the same ones that started calling then Indian in the first place? In other words, all white people are the same? That’s one hell of an advanced Reverse UNO

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        “Indigenous” seems to be acceptable most people. When you know them personally, use their nation or tribal affiliation. Like if your friend was Korean, and you only referred to them as “Asian,” it might feel like you don’t care about the difference.