• EABOD25@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No I’m not. Just say you don’t have an answer for that haha

      • EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Is that so? And what does “informed decision” mean to you?

          • EABOD25@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Is everyone who challenges your ideas a troll? Sorry. I’m still not trolling you OR arguing just to argue.

            And let’s talk about the best decisions. Did Vlad The Impaler think it was the best decision? What about Ghengis Khan? Kubla Khan? Nobunaga Oda? Mitsuhede? Washington? King George? The list goes on and on… So who’s right, and who’s wrong?

            They all had the best evidence available, yet thought that the best way was to oppose a different idea

              • EABOD25@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                What I’m saying is the best evidence available might not be the right evidence

                  • EABOD25@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    All the time, but every aspect should be considered. For example, there was one commenter in this chain that mentioned the potential of bacterium on Mars. If they exist and we land on Mars then we inadvertently impact said bacterium and potentially impact Mars on a scale that we can’t comprehend or at the very least understand. Is that right or wrong?