Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    Ā·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’m going to put a token down and make a prediction: when the bubble pops, the prompt fondlers will go all in on a ā€œstabbed in the backā€ myth and will repeatedly try to re-inflate the bubble, because we were that close to building robot god and they can’t fathom a world where they were wrong.

    The only question is who will get the blame.

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      4 days ago

      In past tech bubbles, it was basically the VCs, the media hypesters and the liars in the companies. So the right people.

    • Architeuthis@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      Ā·
      5 days ago

      I increasingly feel that bubbles don’t pop anymore, the slowly fizzle out as we just move on to the next one, all the way until the macro economy is 100% bubbles.

    • scruiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      Ā·
      6 days ago

      The only question is who will get the blame.

      Isn’t it obvious? Us sneerers and the big name skeptics (like Gary Marcuses and Yann LeCuns) continuously cast doubt on LLM capabilities, even as they are getting within just a few more training runs and one more scaling of AGI Godhood. We’ll clearly be the ones to blame for the VC funding drying up, not years of hype without delivery.

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        4 days ago

        it was me, I popped AI. I destroyed Twitter (and, in collateral damage, I blew up the United States), and those fuckers are next. You’re welcome.

        • scruiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          Ā·
          4 days ago

          You’re welcome.

          Given their assumptions, the doomers should be thanking us for delaying AGI doom!

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      6 days ago

      nah they’ll just stop and do nothing. they won’t be able to do anything without chatgpt telling them what to do and think

      i think that deflation of this bubble will be much slower and a bit anticlimatic. maybe they’ll figure a way to squeeze suckers out of their money in order to keep the charade going

      • HedyL@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        5 days ago

        maybe they’ll figure a way to squeeze suckers out of their money in order to keep the charade going

        I believe that without access to generative AI, spammers and scammers wouldn’t be able to successfully compete in their respective markets anymore. So at the very least, the AI companies got this going for them, I guess. This might require their sales reps to mingle in somewhat peculiar circles, but who cares?

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          5 days ago

          i meant more like scamming true believers out of their money like happens with crypto, this is cfar deal currently. spam, as something nobody should or wants to spend their creative juices on, or for that matter interact in any way, seems a natural fit for automation with llms