One in 4 middle-income new homeowners — twice as many as a decade before — are buying into cost-burdened situations.

The share of middle-class Americans who are buying wallet-squeezing homes has more than doubled in the previous 10 years.

Almost 30% of middle-class homeowners bought homes with monthly payments costing more than 30% of their income in 2022, an NBC News analysis of Census Bureau data found. That’s more than twice the share from 2013, with experts warning it leaves many households with less money for groceries and emergencies and less able to get ahead in the future.

That “cost-burdened” benchmark — in which a household devotes over 30% of income to housing costs — is a widely used measure of affordability for both homeownership and renting. The Census Bureau measures housing costs against it, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development has used it for decades.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Because renting a home that’s barely enough to get by is even more expensive and will go up faster than inflation, so if you’re lucky you buy a house that’s barely enough to get by and wait for the day when it’s finally affordable since the payments don’t increase as much as inflation.

    • kobra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah but repairs don’t get taken care of by a landlord. When you buy a home, you have even less monthly funds available for mortgage because you also need to be saving a little for the big repair things that come up.

      Renting allows those repair expenses to be handled by the landlord rather than the tenant. Renting is not inherently a worse decision than buying, there are pros and cons to both.

    • vinylshrapnel@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It all sounds good until your mortgage increases by 25% in one year due to increasing property taxes and insurance.

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        But the same happens to the rental owner, and trust me, they pass that increase on to the renters. So it’s still better than that.

        • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          No, it’s exactly the same. Actually. Not even factoring in that as a homeowner, you’re responsible for the replacement of all your appliances, your roof, paint, walls, HVAC, plumbing, water heater, and on and on. And we are talking surprise $20,000 repair.

          • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            You’re delusional if you think renting is “cheaper” than owning. Sure you don’t pay those piddly expenses when you’re renting, but with your own home you’re building equity and with rent prices how they are you can still save money on top of house repairs better than renting

          • acchariya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Do you think you are not somehow paying for each and every one of those expenses as well as a healthy return to investors, in your rent?

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              43 minutes ago

              Depending on how much the investor’s interest rates are they could be covering maintenance costs, making a profit, and still charging less than a new mortgage at current interest rates. So depending on your landlord and how much profit they’re trying to squeeze, renting might be a better option than buying right now.