• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Seriously, I’m getting tired of hearing people throw around words like dated and modern to describe what are just a different styles of app UI.

      There’s nothing wrong with how it looks now. As long as the new look doesn’t hide actual features and options while wasting screen space, I’ll be fine with it, but there was nothing wrong with how it is now.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sometimes it’s justified. If an app looks like it was designed for Windows 3.1, Android C, or god forbid Motif, it just screams “hasn’t been maintained in decades”, and it looks terrible.

        But yeah, I don’t have any aesthetic complaints with Bitwarden. It’s neither pretty nor ugly, just functional.

    • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a bullshit headline. The real benefit is quicker access to new, native features in the OS. So, for that reason, I’m happy they’re making the move. But making it about how a utility product looks just seems… unimportant to me.

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Bezier@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Material tends to be ugly as balls but if usability improves, that’s great.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I tend to think the modern material doesn’t provide nearly as much opportunity to be colorful and provide a unique visual identity as the OG material did.