taco

And “anti-law enforcement agitators” = non-whites who don’t want their children kidnapped.

Total non-issue. I’d be surprised if anyone can provide a single credible instance of this biting someone in the ass.

Yeah, the phrasing definitely makes it seem like “one” refers to “plane” not “model” here. Headline is textbook clickbait.

True, though I was on kbin initially and found the microblogging stuff easy enough to just ignore.

it defeats the entire purpose of Lemmy

Piefed is a separate software, so more aligned with lemmy than a specific instance. Moot point right now, as there’s only a handful of instances.

I think the real answer is less advocating against Piefed (which is getting some preference thanks to QoL additions for community management, I think), but rather advocate for some of the larger communities moving to Piefed to spin up a whole new instance.

As an aside, it seems like mbin isn’t getting any love throughout this process.

Given how they ran things, I think it’d be most fair to allow grok to interview each of them an assign the method it sees fit on a case by case basis.

Please don’t associate me with him.

I mean, both things can be true?

I don’t think that’s true. They could both be aims, but one would be secondary (or at least not primary).

I don’t think they’re both true at all though. I don’t believe for a second the risk posed by/to users invested enough to root their phones is high enough to warrant this nonsense. The cynical/profitable explanation seems a whole lot more likely, imo.

Not to mention the cost savings difference. Developer salaries make a ChatGPT subscription look like a bargain. C-level salaries make racks of dedicated hardware to run local models look like one.