Didn’t work for me :( but maybe it was too close @remindme 2025-06-15

Does that actually work?

@remindme 2025-06-13

Good point

This picture makes me nervous, that laptop is going to fall any moment now

Their brain liquidated while writing this

That makes sense

End users: To access Gemini summary cards, users need to have smart features and personalization smart features in Gmail, Chat, and Meet and smart features in Google Workspace turned on. Visit the Help Center to learn more about collaborating with Gemini in Gmail.

Sounds like it’s an opt in, what am I missing

It also somewhat instils distrust in science IMO, goes along the “eggs were bad for our health just 10y ago” type of argument

I’d recommend reading the article before trying to make a comparison.

When water condenses on surfaces, it usually requires either a drop in temperature or very high humidity levels. Conventional water harvesting methods rely on these principles, often requiring energy input to chill surfaces or a dense fog to form to collect water passively from humid environments. But Lee and Patel’s system works differently.

This is what it feels like seeing these news title about Russia’s economic collapse

I wish they’d offer a way to mitigate bias in the summary article since we can’t see if in the actual study requires access to see if the researchers did

Veritasium (youtube) did a piece on this, can’t remember which video it was, might’ve been the one on his thesis of how to teach STEM topics in videos