Not to mention lobbying against anything that would possibly help the situation and unseat them of their stranglehold on people’s medical outcomes.

We’ve been led to believe that killing someone through the world’s shitiest Rube Goldberg machine of paperwork, policy, legalese, and “just doing my job” is somehow not killing someone.

Killing with a pen is no morally better than killing with a gun. One just takes longer than the other.

Maybe this is some conspiracy shit I’m about to say, but maybe we should look at the common denominators here? Fill in the blanks with your topic of choice.

Both the Democrats and the Republicans have a shared interest in __________.

I asked what you thought a legitimate criticism (that wasn’t presented enough by media) was of Trump and you essentially just hand waved. If this is such a problem in your eyes surely you wouldn’t need to use Google or soul-seek to find an example.

Do you think him being convicted of sexual abuse was just “noise” that drowned out the actual problems? Is that something not worth informing voters about? I’m confused where you’re trying to draw the line here. Is the character of a candidate not to be scrutinized? Shouldn’t we try to be sure that a candidate will do the right thing even when it isn’t reported on?

In your mind what is a “real” issue about Trump that hasn’t been covered? I’m curious what criticism you think has been lost here. The man has had almost every detail of himself, his circle, and his platform dissected constantly for the last forever it seems like.