LovesTha🥧

@Voyajer @AgentOrangesicle Yeah, they really need to be exterminated (at least for a few thousand km from here)

@FireRetardant @Lysergid If you want people to actually use PT for most trips, 20m frequency is woeful. 20m is okay if you only expect it to be an option for people lucky enough to have a direct service (so CBD commuters).

5~10m frequency at all times still means waiting 10~20m for a normal trip, as a normal trip will include 2~4 services.

Also the cost pressure before alternatives are viable is cruel to those who can’t pay. And mostly not needed. A good PT will be used without the pressure.

@AceBonobo @Showroom7561 I believe that around here they are required to be removed when not in use.

Not that anyone knows this.

@Boomkop3 @rcbrk (Which points out to me that we are plausibly all agreeing in different words)

@Boomkop3 @rcbrk Sounds like a pretty good point in the argument that car dependence is not freedom.

@ajsadauskas @fuck_cars All they need to do is say the winning tender will be determined by number of affordable homes it includes.

(Yes I want them to do more than that, but just thinking of minimal things that would work really well)