Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

So since he is actually broke it wouldn’t hurt if we took all that wealth and redistributed it?

Lmao it’s insane what some people do to downplay the insane excess wealth of the literal richest person ever.

AI is a buzzword with no real ability more than the Machine Learning approaches that have existed for over 20 years now.

AI isn’t real, we have not achieved artificial intelligence. Its a marketing term made to hype up pump and dumps.

They made LLMs make ChatGPT sound like a person but it’s just as dumb as the programs that came before that didn’t sound like a person.

The current Machine Learning models have reached the limitations of their usefulness, and creating more powerful approaches means someone inventing a more efficient algorithmic approach to Machine Learning, which we still haven’t done after we reached this model 20 years ago.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/openai-rivals-seek-new-path-smarter-ai-current-methods-hit-limitations-2024-11-11/

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

Well fundamentally there’s no difference between a stubborn right winger and a right wing GPT bot.

So if they don’t change their tone after being presented with correct information they should be ostracized from these spaces.

The right wing extremists and bots should be contained to Twitter

A not very creative way to criminalize homelessness

And these are the takeaways

This unironically.

The Neoliberals have shown they are incapable of representing their voters anymore.

We need a progressive party

Making excuses for the shortcomings of society enable society to continue to have shortcomings.

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

Remember, if you find them attractive that means they’re out of your league!

/s

Eww no I’m not religious.

99% of people in American prisons don’t need to be there. Because a humane system would focus on reforming them instead of just punishment.

The people on death row are deemed impossible to reform.

But since the system is based on suffering instead of reform it would make sense to make the unreformable suffer the most, which it’s debatable if that’s the death penalty or life in a cell.

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

I have very little issues with executing death row inmates. The only reason I’m not 100% for it is because sometimes we fuck up and get the wrong person.

But if they did a horrible crime personally I think a lifetime in a cell is worse than a quick death, so if we really want to punish them we should only do life in prison to maximize suffering.