I’ll make my own determination tyvm. And as already stated, I agree with their analysis. Find a less biased source.

Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

Analysis / Bias

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor mainly focuses on human rights violations, especially in conflict zones like Gaza. The organization’s articles often use emotionally loaded language. Headlines like “Int’l committee must investigate Israel’s holding of dead bodies in Gaza​” exemplify this. The cited sources, such as NPR, are often credible but can lean towards perspectives emphasizing violations by certain state actors, potentially omitting broader contextual details, which could lead to a one-sided view of the situation. This selection of stories and framing indicates a significant bias against actions taken by Israel.

Not as sad as what 42k dead? Keep on defending violence with violence though. Definitely not sad.

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor

Yes, I am. Didn’t get a paragraph in when these criticisms became obvious to me before I even checked. OFC I disregard the report. It is biased af.

The question was rhetorical. But no, I’m not reading your clearly biased copypasta.

Clearly, more violence is what will fix this. /s

Be sure to let me know when an #-page report is released and/or casualty projections are large enough that the price-tag isn’t worth it. Otherwise you’re using violence to justify violence and this cycle of death continues… to whose benefit again?

There there. I was only kidding. Everybody knows violence results in the weak winning and the strong crying about it. 🙄

That’s what happens when you resort to violence. The strong win and the weak cry about injustice. Maybe next time they’ll not bombard Israel with rockets if the price tag is too high.