Of course:

The rest of the instructions are all valid n-controlled Toffolis and Hadamards, but of course mostly Toffolis since it’s replicating a classical algorithm. There is no quantum advantage, it’s just a classical algorithm written in a format compatible with a quantum computer.

Add small errors to the quantum simulator (quantum computers always have those) and all’ll break entirely - apparently (1) no error correction was used and (2) it’s just logic gates for Doom rewritten as quantum gates. No wonder the author got bored, I’d be bored too.

Discounting temporary tech issues, I haven’t browsed internet without an adblocker for a single day in my entire life. Nobody is entitled to abuse my attention; no guilt, no exceptions.

In my mind, it’s more of digital hygiene than victim-blaming. The core issue remains: even seemingly innocent ads (“we sell bananas”) are manipulative in their intent, and they introduce interruptions into your flow of thought. That’s already abusive.

I just saw a Youtube ad

I’d say you’re doing something wrong then already. There’s no reason to tolerate any deliberate assault on your mental integrity, e.g. ads. At least when there’re solutions as simple as configuring adblockers / using alternative apps. It’s harder with ads in your city.