• spicehoarder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Apparently there’s thousands of billionaires. Which completely baffles. Just one of them could make sure kids never had to go hungry ever again.

        • Robbity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Kids don’t go hungry because of money, they go hungry because of politics. Famines are the product of conflict, especially war. And hunger in countries that are not at war is a product of social inequality. Sure a billionaire could help but that’s just a temp fix.

          • Professorozone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I disagree. I believe that billionaires control the world. It is their attitude that is pervasive throughout government that allows the hunger to continue. Not to mention the number of uber rich people in the various governments, riding around in limousines while their people starve.

            Also capitalism requires a large body of poor people to support it. Those cheap T-shirts aren’t made by highly paid labor. And who benefits most from capitalism?

            I can probably come up with numerous other connections between the ultra rich and the state of poverty.

          • o1011o@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            My [sister/brother/other] in [insert deity] have you forgotten that in almost every place on the globe food is purchased with money? And that money is also how you buy politicians? One billionaire absolutely could solve hunger through a combination of direct donation and political spending.

          • andybytes@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I think it’s like a mixture of both. There’s like a relationship between the two, you know? I feel like your contribution is necessary though. Like, what is money? But the physical representation of our collective endeavors. The state takes away our autonomy and gets us the chase after money. When money can no longer buy things, the state uses its monopoly of violence to keep us all in order. It’s all just like a control structure.

          • andybytes@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I think it’s like a mixture of both. There’s like a relationship between the two, you know? I feel like your contribution is necessary though. Like, what is money? But the physical representation of our collective endeavors. The state takes away our autonomy and gets us the chase after money. When money can no longer buy things, the state uses its monopoly of violence to keep us all in order. It’s all just like a control structure.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The more we have animals exhibiting human behaviors, on top of whales & bees straight up attacking billionaires, the easier it is to believe in a collective subconscious.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Frankly his lavish lifestyle of bee eating was, in retrospect, not a good idea.