Is there a reason why? Less funding? Web devs don’t make the pages Firefox friendly? Since the user base is smaller, they just don’t care?

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you’re developing software for one client who only uses a specific browser, I can see this being okay, but several times I have chosen not to buy things from websites that were broken in Firefox. I don’t bother to check whether they’d work in Chromium, I just buy it elsewhere.

    The number of people who act like me probably isn’t large in absolute terms, but how many customers have been lost because of a broken website that you didn’t even know about because they just left without a trace?

    This might not apply to you, but it’s some food for thought whenever Web developers decide to be sloppy and not check compatibility for a browser that still has significant market share.

    • NoiseColor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The number of people who act like that is negligible. We tested for that.

      We don’t see it as that we are sloppy but that Firefox is not a good browser. We came to that conclusion because no other browser acts like that.

      • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Don’t you think that it may be because Firefox is pretty much the only browser using a different engine that Chromium? There are literally two major browser engines, and you’re developing for one them. Ofc everything else will act like Chromium, because they are Chromium for the most part.

        • NoiseColor@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s all really nice. But the fact is, we use what works. It’s a pragmatic decision. They’re are so few Firefox users and on the end issues are not very common.

          • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The number of Edge users is only a few % more, do you skip that too? Just check Chrome and Safari and call it a day?

            As someone that uses only Firefox and knows others who do, this really surprises me. If a website is broken on Firefox then it’s shitty webdev work and I’ll find another store.

            • NoiseColor@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Everything works fine in edge. Only Firefox has issues.

              Users don’t care why that is. If their app doesn’t work they won’t use this niche browser that very few people use.

              • Syn_Attck@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Funny, we get more complaints about DuckDuckGo browser than anything else, and that’s one of the few we don’t test on. I know this because I make it a point to have someone from CS tell me about consistent pain points users are having. I wonder how many complaints about Firefox not working your customer service team is getting daily and you just don’t hear about it because they’ve been told to tell users “just say Firefox isn’t a supported browser and to try installing Chrome.”

                You should ask someone in CS. Whichever agent bullshits the least (not the manager) - you might learn something.

                Almost 3/10 people accessing your sites are using Firefox. All those “images not loading right or whatever” are probably blatant to them, making them think “wow, what an absolute shit website.”

                3 out of 10.