My salary didn’t change at all, but homes went up 82%. The money I saved for a down payment and my salary no longer are good enough for this home and many others. This ain’t even a “good” home either. It was a 200k meh average ok home before. Now it’s simply unaffordable

  • localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Also here in Europe this is the type of construction we use for a garden shed, not a house.

    Even when we do modern timber frame, it’s generally still brick or block at the bottom. How long do these houses last in the US? I imagine a lot of the continent is pretty humid

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Timber frames are sheathed in treated plywood and then wrapped in siding. Rain doesn’t reach the wood of a barely-maintained house, exterior humidity won’t do damage in any hurry, and wood is rarely making ground contact. These houses last at least a hundred years given that this style is approaching 100 years. It’s usually storm damage through the roof that causes the rotted wood you’re imagining, not normal wear and tear.

    • UnpledgedCatnapTipper@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      My parents’ timber house is from the 1780s and is still solid. So, 240 years at least, give or take. I’m aware of plenty of timber houses from the 1600s that are still standing and functional as well.

      • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Is a timber frame house from back then the same as one built post 1950 though? Some Q’s:

        • Have materials/practices decreased in quality?
        • Has there been a shift from a sense of pride in craft and duty to build well towards cutting corners and saving $?
        • Has the density and properties of wood changed as we use smaller trees grown more quickly in monocultures compared to old-growth harvested lumber of pre 1900s?
    • pendulous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      When wood is properly sealed up in walls, it lasts a very long time. We don’t really have buildings on an old world timescale, but we do still have colonial wood frame buildings.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      In California at least, houses made with a wooden frame are usually on top of concrete (either a concrete slab under the whole house, or a concrete perimeter under the exterior walls), and the frame is bolted into the concrete along the entire perimeter.

      Older homes often aren’t bolted into the concrete, but it’s common to retrofit this to improve earthquake resistance. Without the bolting, the house can move around during an earthquake. The government here has a program (Earthquake Brace and Bolt) where they cover part of the cost of doing this work.

      Masonry (houses made of bricks, stone, etc) are much less common here, since they perform much worse in earthquakes.

      • pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        👍 in Europe earthquakes luckily are less of a concern, so we care more about longevity (you’ll find many places where pretty much every house is well over a hundred years old (the oldest one in my village is about 900 years old)) and good isolation (to keep the heat inside in winter and outside in summer so we can heat less / don’t have to use air conditioning on our way to net zero)