Trump lashed out after interview featured more concise version of Harris’s answer to question on war in Gaza than had appeared in trailer
  • Melllvar@startrek.websiteEnglish
    26·
    4 days ago

    I skimmed the complaint. It’s (obviously) utter nonsense that will be dismissed with prejudice. But if not, then I look forward to joining the class action against Fox News, et al.

        • theneverfox@pawb.socialEnglish
          15·
          4 days ago

          They rule on anything if it becomes a matter of law. Fox News argued they were entertainment not news, and so laws about journalism don’t apply to them

          The court ruled on it, because it now became a matter of law, it must be decided first to know which laws apply in the case

          It might not have been a good ruling, but they did in fact legally judge them to be entertainment and not news.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            1·
            3 days ago

            The court ruled on it, because it now became a matter of law, it must be decided first to know which laws apply in the case

            BTW - I would love to see the court ruling you think decided that “Fox News” is “entertainment” and not “news” as a finding of fact.

            Hint - then thing you’re going to find will talk about the difference between “statements of facts” and of “opinion”. Which is not saying that “Fox is entertainment not news”. Those terms apply to any speech that is being claimed as defamatory.

        • Agrivar@lemmy.world
          24·
          4 days ago

          Do you have to possess below-average intelligence to be a member of sh.itjust.works, or is it just a good way to fit in?