• wick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d automate it but the greybeards tell me it’s a bad idea :(

  • Classy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe I’m just screaming into the void here, but does it seem like, as a person who is still relatively out of touch with linux, I don’t necessarily have to update my Arch distribution whenever there are new updates available? I could theoretically just go on downloading new programs, uninstalling old ones, using everything as it sits until theoretically something breaks?

    • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You should always run a full upgrade when installing a new package to make sure your versions are all in sync. Like if your new package is looking for version 1.1 and you have 1.0 installed, the new package won’t work. In general, everything should be installed with ‘pacman -Syu’ not just ‘pacman -S’

      If you don’t install any new packages, then no you don’t need to upgrade anything. You’re just missing out on security patches and upgraded features. It’s worth running occasional upgrades.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Side note: “I’mma” is a contraction of the whole phrase “I’m going to” or “I’m about to” so it’s followed immediately by the verb indicating what you’ll be doing:

    “I’mma rawdog this sucker without backups.”

    Yes, I added sucker, because it’s going to suck up all your time and data, sucka!

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Op should have used “I’m finna rawdog this jawn no backup style”

      For no reason other than mixed US slang from different regions sounds funnier to my ear

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just do a fresh install man. I’m getting anxiety just by looking at it.

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The atomic distro would do a backup and if update goes wrong, it automatically boots back into the previous one.

    • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know its a meme but nixos is actually good for this. You can be on the unstable branch, not update for 5 years and still get everything working after updating(tho i dont recommend because of security). I think nixos has some fucking AMAZING features but the problem is its paired with features that make it extremely hard to use for a casual user.

      • chirping@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed! I think a part of the “problem” is that with Nix, there’s now at least 3 sides: application specific knowledge, system knowledge, and you have to use the nix language, architecture and tools to interface with it. so for a seasoned linux user, there’s maybe just a new programming language, but if you’re new to Linux, it’s quickly gonna overwhelm you. which in a way is a bit ironic because I’d argue that it’s easier to manage a NixOS system, and getting help is so much easier when your problems can be replicated by just aharing your config.

        • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Id say its easy to share your problems with other people because its a few files unlike distros like arch where your packages can be fucked up and then you have to reinstall in most cases. But the support it self isnt too good. Arch has archwiki, ubuntu has a lot of channels of support while nixos has a badly written wiki.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve updated an Arch install after not being used for 2 years. I don’t think there were any issues.

    I’ve experienced far more issues upgrading to a new major release of an apt based distro though…

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That apt based distro was Ubuntu, wasn’t it?
      I never successfully upgraded that from one release to the next.