Summary

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) repeatedly shouted an anti-trans slur despite objections from Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly.

She defended her remarks by attacking transgender rights and dismissing criticism.

The outburst drew condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates and political figures, highlighting her shift from previously supporting LGBTQ+ rights to embracing anti-trans rhetoric.

Mace has used the slur in past statements and introduced legislation restricting transgender rights.

  • SpitefulSprite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    Shouldn’t she be hiding in a bathroom somewhere, faking injuries while trying to inspect other people’s genitals?

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    t***** is a slur? I gotta watch my deeply pointered C code in the future

          • futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 minutes ago

            When someone with guns is coming for me, what do you suggest I should do? Sweet reason? Aikido?

            If you don’t understand the situation, don’t judge. There’s a big difference between persecution and resisting persecution.

          • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Before this year, I was absolutely anti-gun. I’m a teacher, and it chills me that every time I enter a classroom I think “how the hell am I going to get these kids out of here if shit goes down”. That’s how I start my Monday’s.

            Owning a gun at home is statistically more dangerous to you or someone you love than to an intruder.

            Most school shooters are taken down by unarmed teachers who work together.

            But we aren’t facing intruders or school shooters. We are facing the proud boys, Jan6ers, and now the federal government. I normally don’t believe in violence and weapons either, but the context has changed and now we cannot rely on promises of public officials to keep us safe. We cannot rely on the police to keep us safe (as if we could before). We cannot rely on any market force to keep us safe.

            Only we can keep us safe. This shit is getting real, and for those of us who are most likely staring down the barrel of a fascists gun, we can’t just let that happen.

            I hate that this is the reality.

            I should never have to consider these things.

            But in America, every conservative and their mom is carrying, and we in the cities have been complacent. Obviously you are not from America. You don’t understand the sheer amount of guns here. Sadly it’s creating a feedback loop and to sit unarmed is to be a sitting duck in a civil war/ genocide situation.

            The time for the idealism of pacifism is done. If you are neutral you are on the side of the oppressor.

            • futatorius@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              20 minutes ago

              I was a complete pacifist for a couple decades. Now, I’m a believer in peace through being a hard target. You cannot rely on the basic human decency of sociopaths to save you. You need to deter their aggression by making it more costly and risky.

            • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I’d think it this way: Get the training anyway, hold off buying if that’s morally (and understandably so) difficult.

              If shit hits the fan before you get one and/or it’s otherwise too late, there’ll be chances of obtaining one in the middle of the shitstorm one way or another. Maybe someone friendly has one, but never got around to proper training? Good thing you did. You can help out and try your best to utilise it as morally but also as professionally and efficiently as you can.

              Slightly more long term, you can assist training others, if using one on live targets still feels objectionable (and rightly so!) to you.

              Learning the craft and proper handling will not go to waste, if it starts looking even worse than it does now.

              It can be good, too, to help others use the things more safely and otherwise properly. May save lives. And you need not take any, not in defense or otherwise, if that’s important to you.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s pretty funny. The whole article is about her using a specific slur but it won’t even mention what the slur was. Well done good reporting.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Hate speech is censored to avoid normalizing language intended to encourage violence against the disempowered.

      • Lysergid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        It makes no sense. How people know the word that should not be normalized? I’m non-native speaker and after all blah blah in this thread I still have no idea what is the word. So if someone says it, I won’t even know I should call out that person. Don’t we normalize using slurs by softening reporting? If slur censored why would bigots stop using it if they are not properly shamed? All it does is just hiding issue from media with no effect IRL. IRL, US elected bigot

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Oooh, nicely put.

        Before your comment, I was thinking, “why not show the word? What word could it be? I’m a big boy and it won’t hurt me,” but … after your comment I think I get it.

        I may have to take this away and think on it, and thank you for the catalyst.

      • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah but you could report without reporting the word if that is the case. You could keep the fact “the slur has been used” yet they go the extra mile to put it and censored it it. The reporting should just say the fact that a representative used a discriminatory language. I agree with you that we are on for 4 years of hyper normalization https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HyperNormalisation

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 minutes ago

          That used to be the word I used for the tranmission of my car. Not any more. Bigots spoil everything.

        • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They use that word in “family friendly” automotive related YouTube channels all the time without getting dinged for demonitization or bans etc. Maybe their moderators have learned context?

          • Hegar@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Hate speech is intended to encourage violence and dehumanize others. Censoring the word helps build the social taboo that discourages the use of hate speech and helps isolate people who insist on using it.

            Adults take responsibility for the effect their words and actions have on the world.

            • SatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Just like we can’t say Voldemort right? I dunno in reporting they should report what is said. Reporters should be asking. “What do you have an issue with. Diversity. Inclusion. Or equity? Don’t be shy get specific for me!” But they are all billionaires whores.

            • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              6 hours ago

              No censoring word is for cowards and assholes. Same as banning books. Stop censoring words were not children and no one hear is encouraging violence. Just trying to get the full picture. Just like I will call that GOP member who used the slur a fucking cunt.

              • Majorllama@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                You’re wasting your time. I got banned from somewhere else earlier for talking about this. They are so unbelievably sensitive that you can’t even type out a word in a conversation about what words count as a slur without them taking that very discussion as a slur. Zero thought from them as to how that might become a problem down the line.

                They don’t see any difference in saying a word while discussing the word vs using the word directed at someone with malice. They are incapable of understanding any nuance in language.

              • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                28
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Unless you’re trans, that isn’t your call to make. You don’t get to decide that it’s ok for people other than yourself to be exposed to slurs. Stay in your own lane.

                • Azzu@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  25 minutes ago

                  But I’m just sitting here, genuinely wondering what the slur is she used, because I have no idea. I’m not well versed in trans slurs. Idk, news reporting should at least give me some way to find out… Like a spoiler tag to click on. Just… something.

                • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Two of my children have trans boyfriends, and I am not advocating for us to go around insulting people with slurs. My comment was why are reporting sluring words. We should know what the bitch said. It’s Congress we have right to know what they are saying and doing. Parts of lemmy seem to be turning into reddit. Next they ban people for speaking against fucking nazis or saying to punch a fucking nazi.

              • ProIsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 hours ago

                The internet is amazing. You see someone with their light coming on and showing growth and then you also see this guy in the same post.

          • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            As an exercise to the reader, the above post was exercising the slur liberally in an attempt to claim it’s “barely an insult”

            Mods seem to think otherwise :)

  • niketunic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    damn. i don’t know much about her other than she’s been pretty vocal about UAP transparency. sucks that she’s an asshole too.