• Kaldo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    That’s a lot of assumptions that I can’t agree are inherently true. Forcing people to participate might not make them think at all beyond fulfilling the duty and not paying a fine, and random votes might not balance out the charismatic leaders at all - if anything the charismatic populist leaders that focus on good PR over substance will probably gather up more of these uneducated “just circle something” voters than the others. It is where/why marketing and commercials work so well in the first place and I’d rather not give even more power to this type of brainwashing, it is a popularity contest enough as it is.

    If anything, I’d make it so in order for people’s votes to count they need to show at least a very basic understanding of what they are voting for and what are the implications of it.

    • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      One of you depends on people wanting aganecy in their own lives and a fair world, the other depends on everyone being literally too dumb and selfish to do the bare minimum to keep society from collapsing without a gun held to their head.

      I know which world I would rather be living in