asudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 hours agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1444arrow-down16 cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@lemmy.world
arrow-up1438arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square99fedilink cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@lemmy.world
minus-squarepmc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·7 hours agoIsn’t Vaultwarden used with non-free Bitwarden clients?
minus-squareBilb!@lem.monsterlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 minutes agoThis need not be the case, though! There’s an open source client on Android called Keyguard. I don’t think the desktop app was at all useful anyway. You can just log into your Vaultwarden through any browser. The desktop app is pointless.
minus-squarefmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 hours agoThe clients are free.
minus-squarepmc@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 hours agoThey now require a non-free Bitwarden SDK component. That’s what this whole conversation is about.
minus-squareAisteru@lemmy.aisteru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·28 minutes agoCould you ELI5 please?
Isn’t Vaultwarden used with non-free Bitwarden clients?
This need not be the case, though! There’s an open source client on Android called Keyguard. I don’t think the desktop app was at all useful anyway. You can just log into your Vaultwarden through any browser. The desktop app is pointless.
The clients are free.
They now require a non-free Bitwarden SDK component. That’s what this whole conversation is about.
Could you ELI5 please?