95 wasn’t bad. 98 had some bugs and they quickly released 98SE, which was great and then they released the soggy turd of windows Millennium.
That was their disaster year. Windows ME, released just 2 years after 98 in 2000, and written out of existence just one year later by Windows XP.
Windows XP… such expressive, truly material-like, design, only Vista comes close. But XP ran so much better.
HEROSHIMA! CHERNOBYL! WINDOWS 95! WE DO IT ONCE, WE DO IT AGAIN!
blue screens
Windows 11
I’m certain my productivity at work dropped significantly because of this fucking upgrade. It’s slow as molasses, at times unstable and 50% of the time I send the laptop to “hibernate,” both it and me wake up to yet another update cycle, meaning it did a completely unwanted hard restart and my unsaved work has been lost without a warning. Crazy my company is paying for that shit.
You mean: Windows 9 '11
Have you used Windows 95?
Windows 3.1 and 3.11 were amazing. Windows 95 was fine. Windows 98 was much better. Windows ME would make the most sense in this tag’s context, but it’s not a number so 95 is the next best option.
It was buggy and crashed a lot, but at least there was no telemetry.
Windows 8
START ME UP!
Can someone explain?
Hiroshima was a man-made disaster that happened in 1945.
Chernobyl was a man-made disaster that happened in 1986.
And now generalise for the punchline.