TLDR:
Windows 11 v24H2 and beyond will have Recall installed on every system. Attempting to remove Recall will now break some file explorer features such as tabs.

YT Video (5min)

Invidious Link

Original Github Issue

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    it was vastly easier to install linux mint than it is to figure out registry editing or whatever the fuck i’d need to avoid this

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is where some Windows shill says “you only need to fix it once!” as if this is your only computer ever, and the only problem you need to fix. And then Windows changes it back to their default in next year’s update.

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The difference between Linux and Windows is on Linux you’re working with the operating system to make modifications and taking advantage of its vast resources (extensive wikis on major distos, terminal auto completion with fish and zsh, preconfigured defaults when installing through the package manager, etc). Meanwhile on Windows you’re actively working against the system in order to disable unwanted features like AI and telemetry.

      (Also I would recommend looking into Debian, the software may be a tad bit old but its the most stable distribution)

      • pixelscript@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        Happy Debian daily driver here. I would never ever recommend raw Debian to a garden variety would-be Linux convert.

        If you think something like Debian is something a Linux illiterate can just pick up and start using proficiently, you’re severely out of touch with how most computer users actually think about their machines. If you even so much as know the name of your file explorer program, you’re in a completely different league.

        Debian prides itself on being a lean, no bloat, and stable environment made only of truly free software (with the ability to opt-in to nonfree software). To people like us, that’s a clean, blank canvas on a rock-solid, reliable foundation that won’t enshittify. But to most people, it’s an austere, outdated, and unfashionable wasteland full of flaky, ugly tooling.

        Debian can be polished to any standard one likes, but you’re expected to do it yourself. Most people just aren’t in the game to play it like that. Debian saddles questions of choice almost no one is asking, or frankly, even knew was a question that was ask*-able*. The sheer customizeability is the flaw, not the feature.

        I am absolutely team “just steer them to Mint”. All the goodness of Debian snuck into their OS like medicine in a kid’s dessert, wrapped up in something they might actually find palatable. Debian itself can be saved for when, or shall I say if, the user eventually goes poking under the hood to discover how the machine actually ticks.

      • Lobreeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        Debian is probably one of the worst choices for someone looking to try Linux, especially for gaming.

        Nothing better than setting everything up only to find you can’t install some new thing because you’re xyz is too old

        • Omniforous@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          I was on Debian Sid for a year or 2 and gaming was working perfectly until I did an update that uninstalled my GUI and WiFi drivers. I’m on Mint now and it’s been smooth sailing so far

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I absolutely love Linux mint. I use it daily for dev work, but I’d also install it on my mother’s old laptop so she could keep using Facebook on it or whatever.

      • TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        I’ve been very impressed by the out-of-the-box experience with Pop!_OS. My Steam games work, and I have Elder Scrolls Online running through Lutris.

        So far, everything just works.

      • mack7400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Same. First distro that was actually painless 10 years ago, and I haven’t looked back.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Nah, mate, Linux is hard, you need to know what a Wayland is. In comparison, Windows is very simple and lightweight, you only have to run a dozen Powershell scripts and edit the registry weekly to get rid of ads.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m thinking of changing my life (to require less of rot-affected computing) and moving to FreeBSD. Even Linux is hard in small ways, even if worlds easier than Windows. Would be OpenBSD if not for games.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Mate you think BSD is better than Linux for ease-of-configuration – in what fucking universe?!

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I dunno

          in what fucking universe

          “BSD” is one thing, so can’t answer your question.

          If you meant that Linux has a lot of graphical configurators to do things - GUI is not necessarily easier than editing config files, because config files can be clean and compact and examples well-commented, and documentation can actually describe how to use the bloody thing. It’s just that in Linux this is not the case. While GUI configurators can be hardly usable nonsense and yes, in Linux they mostly are.

          And this difference in wide strokes is indeed common for all 4 BSDs against Linux for things that differ between operating systems.

          The rest sucks just as badly.