Grapho@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 5 天前Spot the differencelemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square371fedilinkarrow-up1587arrow-down1260
arrow-up1327arrow-down1external-linkSpot the differencelemmy.mlGrapho@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 5 天前message-square371fedilink
minus-squarePlastic_Ramses@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down11·edit-25 天前I just dont like billionaires in any form wether or not they work as “adapters”. The article is just long form “the west has them, so we should have them”. Billionaires arent under the peoples control. they’re under the control of a dictator.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·5 天前It isn’t, actually. It attempts to examine why the PRC has them in the first place.
minus-squareGrapho@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·5 天前They skimmed it for talking points, ain’t no way a person with such surface level opinions can analyze that article in 5 minutes lmao
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·5 天前Of course, hence my pointing out their mistake.
I just dont like billionaires in any form wether or not they work as “adapters”.
The article is just long form “the west has them, so we should have them”. Billionaires arent under the peoples control. they’re under the control of a dictator.
It isn’t, actually. It attempts to examine why the PRC has them in the first place.
They skimmed it for talking points, ain’t no way a person with such surface level opinions can analyze that article in 5 minutes lmao
Of course, hence my pointing out their mistake.