• Lambda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ada, hands down. Every time I go to learn Rust I’m disappointed by the lack of safety. I get that it’s miles ahead of C++, but that’s not much. I get that it strikes a much better balance than Ada (it’s not too hard to get it to compile) but it still leaves a lot to be desired in terms of safe interfacing. Plus it’s memory model is more complicated than it needs to be (though Ada’s secondary stack takes some getting used to).

    I wonder if any other Ada devs have experience with rust and can make a better comparison?

    • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have done quite a bit of C, C++, Ada, and Pascal development. I recently got into Rust. I am still getting used to Rust, but it feels a bit like someone tried to apply Ada to C++. I like the modern development environment, but I am slower writing code than I would be in Ada or C++. The one feature of Ada that I really like and want other languages to adopt is the Rep spec. I write driver code and being able to easily and explicitly identify which symbol corresponds to which bit is really good.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would use Ada or Spark in a heartbeat if there was an easy-to-use, mature cross-platform GUI library for it.