Teddy (left), and Sampson (right)

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Its so odd how people defend the continued existence of these creatures.

    What kind of twisted brain do you need to have, to defend something that regularly attacks and injures, sometimes even kills completely innocent people.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      What kind of twisted brain do you need to have, to defend something that regularly attacks and injures, sometimes even kills completely innocent people.

      You also just described a human.

      • RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        There are over 2 million animal species on Earth, and one species is responsible for 99.9% of all lethal attacks. Ban Humans (from existing)!

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        A violent criminal human if anything. Would you defend murderers and people that assault others?

        For humans we have prisons because they have human rights and we cant morally control their existence.

        With dogs we can absolutely control their existence and there is no real moral dilemma there whatsoever. We can just stop making more of them. DONE.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I can’t really disagree there. My concern is about the dogs that exist now and didn’t harm anyone. Dogs are also dependent on how their human trains them - the fault is many times in the master just not managing their dogs properly.

          Don’t put all the dogs in one basket just based on breed if you are not ready to do it with humans.