Welp…I went down an NSFW image search rabbit hole and, although far from being conclusive, my opinion is that yes, the penises are pretty much the same on identical siblings (saw a few triplets).
Yeah, close enough. Personally I’m like 6 inches taller and weigh more because birth trauma, but we are identical. Twin is shorter in general, but just imagine shrunk a bit but proportionate. However you spell that.
Classic nature versus nurture debate. Assuming identical male twins, anyway. Anything else and the answer is far more likely to be “no”. Bob probably has a bigger D than his twin sister Sally. Probably.
But once you narrow it down, well, they really ought to be the same unless something significant happened to one and not the other. Note that the significance of that thing might not at first appear to be significant, however.
e.g. Maybe one time and only one time, Mom or Dad fed one of them twice by accident when the twins were infants and then had to the feed the hungry one “again” when he wouldn’t stop crying (if they realised the error or not).
That one extra bottle of milk with no other differences might have made for a lifetime of difference between the two. And you still can’t be sure which one would end up better endowed. Maybe something latent in the twins’ genes would gives a hungry baby the advantage later in life, so to speak.
ETA: If this sort of thing is your cup of tea, you might find pictures out there on the internet. If it isn’t, you might want to perform the same experiment using women’s attributes instead. I understand certain forms of twin “art” are quite popular.
Have to admit it’s a good question
Welp…I went down an NSFW image search rabbit hole and, although far from being conclusive, my opinion is that yes, the penises are pretty much the same on identical siblings (saw a few triplets).
Beggs the follow up question do identical female twins have the same breast size if they are approximately the same body weight
From being a female twin
Yeah, close enough. Personally I’m like 6 inches taller and weigh more because birth trauma, but we are identical. Twin is shorter in general, but just imagine shrunk a bit but proportionate. However you spell that.
Twins are identical, and mirror twins are identical in every way except their features are swapped.
What about evil twins?
Ah, mirror universe twins? One dresses more provocatively.
And tend to be a bit campy
She’s mad because she doesn’t know the answer
Classic nature versus nurture debate. Assuming identical male twins, anyway. Anything else and the answer is far more likely to be “no”. Bob probably has a bigger D than his twin sister Sally. Probably.
But once you narrow it down, well, they really ought to be the same unless something significant happened to one and not the other. Note that the significance of that thing might not at first appear to be significant, however.
e.g. Maybe one time and only one time, Mom or Dad fed one of them twice by accident when the twins were infants and then had to the feed the hungry one “again” when he wouldn’t stop crying (if they realised the error or not).
That one extra bottle of milk with no other differences might have made for a lifetime of difference between the two. And you still can’t be sure which one would end up better endowed. Maybe something latent in the twins’ genes would gives a hungry baby the advantage later in life, so to speak.
ETA: If this sort of thing is your cup of tea, you might find pictures out there on the internet. If it isn’t, you might want to perform the same experiment using women’s attributes instead. I understand certain forms of twin “art” are quite popular.