• ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    gimp isn’t being held back by money, they have over a million in bitcoin just sitting there from an old donation that grew in value. In over a decade, no one has figured out how to pay the taxes on it if they start using it to fund developers.

    I read on reddit a long time ago that a UI designer tried to help improve gimp, but the devs were hostile to it (i may be remembering that wrong though). Considering how long its been with no UI improvements, I don’t think gimp will ever revamp its UI. Instead, I think Krita has a good chance of moving into photo editing with enough funding.

    • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately, Krita’s main dev has long covid and in the last year they haven’t been working much…

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Instead, I think Krita has a good chance of moving into photo editing with enough funding.

      As someone who doesn’t really do photo editing, one thing I never quite understood is what’s missing for that to be viable right now.

      For reference, the one time I had to edit a photo a few years ago, I just used Krita to move/remove a few objects and do some basic color grading. It didn’t feel like there was anything missing.

      Granted, I never used software like Photoshop either.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        There’s a few areas where it’s lacking, the text tool being one of them, and it also can’t export to PDF for professional book cover printing. But I’m not a professional photo editer either, and almost exclusively use Krita for editing anyway, since it’s so my h easier to use.