• naun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No, he won’t. Or he might, ostensibly, but they will never be propery researched and they will never be properly regulated, so you won’t really know what you’re getting or how it should be administered, so good luck with that.

      The only thing you can reliably count on with the incoming administration is that whatever they are doing, they are doing to make themselves and their friends wealthier, at the expense of the rest of the public. Unfortunately, that doesn’t only mean finacial expense.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would suck for the rubes who can be fooled into taking poison, but it would be kinda based if RFK just legalized everything. Reality might turn to shit, but at least we can get high however we want!

      • Swallowtail@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Being able to grow mushrooms legally would be fucking sick and would make the next four years a bit less shitty.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I wonder how hard it will be to tell the good stuff from the poison. Depending on just how unregulated they go, labels might not even match contents.

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Probably easier than now considering the decrease in stigma and increased impetus for testing as well as elimination of the black market.

          • naun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            55 minutes ago

            I doubt that. Erasing stigma is an important step in researching these drugs. Reclassification so that they are accessable for research is another. However, proper regulation is required so that you know what you’re getting and in the right dosage. The incoming administration want more deregulation. That will mean that quality of supply will be less reliable.

            We are still dealing with increaing outbreaks of foodborne illness because of deregulation from the last Trump government. And this affects more than just Americans. I’m in Canada, but because we import food from the US, we are also exposed to these illnesses. My immunocompromised sister had a bout of listeria from food that she should have been able to trust. (I can’t remember which food at the moment). I still have granola bars in my home that I haven’t disposed of yet which were part of a separate recall.

            Proper regulation works quietly for the average person. When it’s working correctly, you don’t notice the myriad of ways that you’re kept safe every day. It’s when it fails that we notice.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’m not even talking about the fun drugs, but things like a bottle of vitamin supplements, over the counter, or prescription medication. Sure, you can test a batch, but will that mean testing one pill out of each bottle? Or could consistency drop enough that one pill might not say much about the others in the bottle?

            Will testing resources get stretched to the point where many won’t be able to afford them if we’ll need to test each bottle of pills we buy to make sure the producer didn’t just stick a nice label on lead pills to make a quick buck and disappear in the night before the fallout?