I’m going to move away from lastpass because the user experience is pretty fucking shit. I was going to look at 1pass as I use it a lot at work and so know it. However I have heard a lot of praise for BitWarden and VaultWarden on here and so probably going to try them out first.

My questions are to those of you who self-host, firstly: why?

And how do you mitigate the risk of your internet going down at home and blocking your access while away?

BitWarden’s paid tier is only $10 a year which I’m happy to pay to support a decent service, but im curious about the benefits of the above. I already run syncthing on a pi so adding a password manager wouldn’t need any additional hardware.

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Regarding benefits for the paid tier (which I use as a sort of donation):

    1. it’s literally on their page: https://bitwarden.com/help/password-manager-plans/#compare-personal-plans
    2. What I actually use: A bit of the encrypted upload, some 2FA generators for unimportant services (I prefer using another 2FA app with encrypted automated backups. Helps keeping things separate)

    Regarding self-hosting:
    I decided against it.

    1. Too much important stuff in there (+400 accounts)
    2. Too much stuff in there I would need to back up and keep safe. Not in the mood.
    3. Not enough experience with hosting a database. If it would go belly-up I had no one except the internet to ask and figure it out myself. At best some selfhost forum/community.
    • el_abuelo@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think you misread my post. I know what the benefits of their paid teir are, because literally read their page.

      I was asking why people self host. As you don’t self host…I’m not sure why you’re responding, especially not with passive aggressive language like that.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        Didnt feel passive aggresive to me.
        And regarding the question why people self host:
        More or less the usual reasons (e.g. learning, just4fun, experimenting)
        And I gave you the reasons why I decided against it.

        Do with both informations what you need to do. Keeping it in mind or disregard my opinion/choices as not directly answering your question

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    If a FOSS project provides easy self hosting but also a paid hosting I usually go for that to support the project and gain something at the same time. Not only for password managers but any service.

  • HamSwagwich@showeq.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I switched from Lastpass to 1Pass and it was pretty miserable. I then swtiched to Bitwarden. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than LP and 1Pass.

    The reason you’d want to self-host is so that nobody has access to your data but you. “The cloud” is just someone elses computer"

    • nemno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Im curious what makes it better than 1pass? Ive used a few of these, and my experience with 1pass was probably the best. Well, except for the price…

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Bitwarden does external audits with reports and stores in zero knowledge storage.
      Loose your master password and you are fucked. They can’t restore it even if you pay them a million €

      • HamSwagwich@showeq.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That was basically the same claim LP made. Even if true, if you have a bad master password, you can be compromised. While yes, that’s on you, your data is a high priority target in a centralized password store… if you host it yourself, someone would first have to know you had that data to even target you for that. Much less exposure hosting it yourself. The convenience factor and potentially less security than a company hosting passwords have, so it’s kind of a six of one, half dozen of the other.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          Fair points.
          Considering bitwarden is zero knowledge the data in itself is for now ‘safe’ enough to me.
          Though I could be subject to IP/vulnerability scans on my home connection or accidentaly forwarding stuff that puts the security at risk and getting compromised (Seriously…The stuff I could connect and control via VNC I found on shodan was very creepy and frightening).
          Nah mate. Plus maintaining the data I already have is enough for me. Bitwarden would be way too much. But maybe in the future once I figure Linux and docker more out :)

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Keepass hosted on my Nextcloud server. You can have the database synced to however many devices you want, and each one will always have a local copy of the latest version. You can use whatever sync solution you want though: syncthing, Dropbox, google drive etc. I suggest using diceware to generate a strong master passphrase for the database :)

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I selfhost vault warden, and in all honesty, it’s just painless. I do reverse proxy it, but you could also just setup wireguard or Tailscale at home and keep it even more secure that way.

    The reason I chose to selfhost is because I want to be in as much control as possible of my data. I chose Vault warden because it’s fully featured and super easy to deploy the server, ridiculously so.

    Now,if anyone was to ask me if they should selfhost Bitwarden or just use their hosted service, I’d suggest to take the second option, for 2 reasons:

    1.- it’s even easier and just works 2.- if you choose the paid tier it has some nice features and you help the project stay alive

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t understand it tbh. Password managers and email are the main things I avoid self hosting. Email because it’s just too easy to fuck something up and never realize you’re not actually properly sending/receiving email. And password managers because if I lose access to it, I’m kinda royally fucked. And the password managers I use keeps a local copy of your database that gets periodically updated, so even without internet I do still have access.

    • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Could one not theoretically self-host a PW manager that also keeps a local copy of the database for times with no internet?

      Idk if that doesn’t exist yet or what, and there are plenty of other reasons against self-hosting a PW manager but that seems like a logical work-around for that particular problem. Keep your access when the internet is down, and keep your data out of third party control.

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Premium features for free. There are no benefits in relying on a third-party

    • el_abuelo@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Do you mean 2nd party? If not, what is the 3rd party in this situation?

      If you do mean 2nd party - you should have a read through this thread, tonnes of benefit to buying these services.

  • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve used cloud based services for password managers for work and “self host” my personal stuff. I barely consider it self hosting since I use Keepass and on every machine it’s configured to keep a local cached copy of the database but primarily to pull from the database file on my in-home NAS.

    Two issues I’ve had:

    Logging into an account on a device currently not on my home network is brutal. I often resort to simply viewing the needed password and painstakingly type it in (and I run with loooooong passwords)

    If I add or change a password on a desktop and don’t sync my phone before I leave, I get locked out of accounts. Two years rocking this setup it’s happened three times, twice I just said meh I don’t really need to do this now, a third time I went through account recovery and set a new password from my phone.

    Minor complaint:

    Sometimes Keepass2Android gets stuck trying to open the remote database and I have to let it sit and timeout (5 minutes!!!) which gets really annoying but happens very infrequently which is why I say just minor complaint

    All in all, I find the inconvenience of doing the personal setup so low that to me even a $10 annual subscription is not worth it

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Consider shortening your passwords. Random passwords longer than 20 characters is a complete waste of time.

      • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        To me 16 is long haha.

        I usually end up running with 16 characters since a lot of services reject longer than 20 and as a programmer I just like it when things are a power of two. Back in the Dark Times of remembering passwords my longest was 13 characters so when I started using a password manager setting them that long felt wild to me.

        I do have my bank accounts under a 64 character password purely because monkey brain like seeing big security rating in keepass. Entropy go brrrrrrrrrrrr

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Haha, yeah 16 is actually pretty long.

          I guess I’m just used to being forced 16 characters long passwords at long.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I self-Host Vaultwarden at home, this way I have a convenient password manager for myself and my SO, it’s easy to setup and maintain. East to access from the phone, Firefox, etc. Bitwarden app keeps a local cache so even when disconnected from the server I have access to my passwords and it will synchronize at the next connections. I otherwise have a Wireguard VPN setup in case I need to connect to my home server from outside my home.

    Before I used KeePass+syncthing but it was to much configuration to convince my SO to use it. Bitwarden/Vaultwarden was more successful in that regard.

  • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You’ll learn pretty quickly that a large chunk of self-hosting people are the types that are just terrified of having things be outside their control, which by extension means they are terrified of other people that aren’t them running infrastructure. 🫠

      • yonder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The learning aspect is the big one for me. If you need a reliable service with no time spent learning or troubleshooting, you’re probably better using a paid service.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            And at 10€ per year I’ll gladly pay that. Now if it was 10€ per month and almost bi-yearly increasing, because why not, I’d quickly reconsider taking the risk and responsibility of self-hosting the door to my internet- and reallife existence.
            I store everything in there. Banking, health, shopping, etc etc. Not worth it exposing it without knowing how much I expose.
            The things I currently expose are relatively low-risk.

  • mbirth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    After trying them all, I’m back at having a local KeePass database that is synced to all my devices via iCloud and SyncThing. There are various apps to work with KeePass databases and e.g. Strongbox on macOS and iOS integrates deeply into Apple’s autofill API so that it feels and behaves natively instead of needing some browser extension. KeePass DX is available for all other platforms, and there are lots of libraries for various programming languages so that you can even script stuff yourself if you want.

    And I have the encrypted database in multiple places should one go tits up.

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I pay Bitwarden the tenner a year as I have no reason to distrust them and they’re definitely providing a more reliable, securer service than I can self-host.

    I also do an encrypted export once per week and store that export to an encrypted cloud based service and an encrypted USB stick. Takes 2 minutes.

  • april@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Because when whatever company gets a data breach I don’t want my data in the list.

    With bitwarden If your server goes down then all your devices still have a local copy of your database you just can’t add new passwords until the server is back up.

    • slackj_87@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Pretty much this. Combined with how easy it is to install VaultWarden (docker ftw), it was a no brainer for me.

      Also, my little home server is a WAY less juicy target for someone looking to steal and sell a bunch of passwords.

      Been running it for probably about 2 years now. No ISP outages but a couple self-inflicted ones. Didn’t even notice the outages in the BitWarden app/extension.

    • markstos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      1Password’s security model guards against this. Even if they are breached, your passwords cannot be decrypted.

      You are more likely to screw up your own backups and hosting security than they are.

      • april@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        LastPass said the exact same thing. I won’t be a big target like they will though.

        • markstos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          LastPass doesn’t have your password, so it can’t be stolen during a breach.

          But 1Password goes a step further, also requiring a “secret key”, which also can’t be stolen.

          https://support.1password.com/secret-key-security/

          Even if an attacker manages to steal your encrypted data from 1Password and also guess your master password, they still can’t access your data without a secret key.

          For that reason, your 1Password account is more likely to compromised through your own device, not their server. And if your own devices are thoroughly compromised, no password manager can save you— the attacker can potentially grab all you type and see all you see.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Password management is the one thing i don’t plan to self-host, on the grounds of not putting all my eggs in one basket. If something goes wrong and all my shit is fried or destroyed, I don’t want to also fuck around with account recovery for my entire digital existence.

    Plus, if something is breached, im more likely to hear news about Bitwarden than I am about compromised server and/or client versions in a timeframe to actually be able to react to it.