• TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        They could have done it to something that has a connection to climate change. But apparently these people just want to make fools out of themselves.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Respectfully, that’s dumb. They should file a request, schedule it on the calendar, get a permit, then quietly protest, getting noticed by as few people as possible…? The point of something like this is awareness and disruption.

          And if you think that’s not needed, I’d like to remind you that we just elected a government that plans to let Big Oil and giant corporations decimate the planet for short term profit, dismantle the entire Environmental Protection Agency, and withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord. Again, there was no damage to the protected Constitution…

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            You either replied to the wrong comment, or completely made up what you think you read.

            • Empricorn@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I did not. You said they should protest something “related to climate change”. And after they’ve reached those people? They’re then not allowed to protest anymore while the planet burns? Or does it have to be “themed”? I’m simply saying protests are about rejecting rules and laws to get a point across. Even if you didn’t agree with them, you heard about it, and we’re talking about it…

          • chaos@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Maybe there’s a third option besides “do something ineffectual that most people will find annoying, offensive, and unrelated to climate change” and “completely resign ourselves to a climate disaster” that we can try?

            • Empricorn@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              I’m all ears. This shit’s not working, the bad guys are winning, collecting their profits, while the world we all live in is being destroyed…

              • chaos@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                It’s a dire situation and progress isn’t nearly fast enough, but progress is getting made. The answer, as ever, isn’t satisfying because it’s boring and difficult: continue to organize and apply pressure to those in power to take action, and raise awareness by pointing to how it affects people in their own lives. This stunt does neither of those things, and if anything, makes our side look whiny and out of touch.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Give it a go, plenty of glass, plenty of paint.

        Climate saved.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, the adult thing to do is destruction of property that actually contributes to the problem.